Yeah for this statement, "...often Web developers are looking for quick examples...", I don't even care if the examples are higher up on the page or not...I just would like more and more examples. Sometimes the examples are too few or don't fully exemplify options of particular functions, etc. Nevertheless, I'm absolutely grateful to all the folks who put in so much work into MDN. If you are one of those people, know…
The future of MDN: a focus on web docs
31–40 of 113 posts
Re: The future of MDN: a focus on web docs
#32Re: The future of MDN: a focus on web docs
#33Re: The future of MDN: a focus on web docs
#34I just wish they had better SEO than say W3Schools
Re: The future of MDN: a focus on web docs
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
The problem has been that historically W3Schools has been inaccurate. MDN set out to fix that and be the best source. I don't know why W3Schools has so much SEO juice.
Historically maybe but I don't think that's true nowadays.
Re: The future of MDN: a focus on web docs
#36I just wish they had better SEO than say W3Schools
I've just had to get into the habit of appending mdn to all my web development queries to make it show up at the top. Can't count the number of time's I've done the search "[some new array method] mdn". Invaluable website.
Re: The future of MDN: a focus on web docs
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same for RFCs. Let's search for "rfc 1855". The first item is indeed the original plain text source, unfortunately without links or anything: - https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt But the second hit is a third-party source, that doesn't provide much over the plain text version. It doesn't even contain the RFC contents directly. I can't imagine anyone seriously linked to that page, let alone that so many are doing it…
Same search on duckduckgo, first few results are (in order): - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855 (html version) - ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt (text version) - rfc1855.net (another html version which is more readable than the ietf's) - datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc1855/ (information about the history of the rfc) - https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1855 (useless) This is one of the clearest examples yet of why I prefer…
Re: The future of MDN: a focus on web docs
#38I just wish they had better SEO than say W3Schools
I've just had to get into the habit of appending mdn to all my web development queries to make it show up at the top. Can't count the number of time's I've done the search "[some new array method] mdn". Invaluable website.
Re: The future of MDN: a focus on web docs
#39Please stop forcing those stupid horrible-quality Portuguese translations upon me!
Re: The future of MDN: a focus on web docs
#40This change would allow numerous improvements such as up-to-date, relevant examples, issues and pull requests for discussions and improvement etc.