Earlier quoted context omitted.
An editorial in a journal that no one ever heard of by an author from an also-ran university. In medical research you can really only trust meta-studies, because attempts to find a simple cause for any complex disease are legion, and usually wrong.
>from an also-ran university Don't do this. An ad hominem against someone's employer is really lame when you consider the fact that many people don't want to relocate due to family obligations. Using the author's previous research as a signal is reasonable but also lazy.
British ex-polytechnics have it especially bad, they were teaching institutions and declared universities in 1992 and forced to compete for funding with the established universities. (OK, Keele isn't an ex-poly, but it was never good or adequately funded.)
You can't take everything serious that's printed, there is too much junk out there, and then you have to go by heuristics, like journal or affiliation. That's how the "invisible boot" works.