Learning 80’s style programming today
atalasoft.com
Learning 80’s style programming today
1–10 of 21 posts
Re: Learning 80’s style programming today
#2The context was completely different. Controlling what appeared on your TV was quite a novelty! And there weren't other interesting things to do on a computer, except for games.
Re: Learning 80’s style programming today
#3The context was completely different. Controlling what appeared on your TV was quite a novelty! And there weren't other interesting things to do on a computer, except for games.
On page 5 of the programming guide, it has a list of things you can download from CompuServe.
Partial list:
* Games
* Store-front advertising display (flashing and animated)
* Home Babysitter -- teaches kids the alphabet
* business spreadsheet
* sports data (subscription service on compuserve)
* stock quotes (subscription service on compuserve)
Granted, I mostly just played games and hacked programs, but I had a word processor and got a copy of GEOS (GUI windowing environment)
Re: Learning 80’s style programming today
#4I don't think flash gets enough credit in this regard. Despite its many flaws, the sheer volume of people exposed to programming concepts from tinkering with flash is enormous.
I think one of the biggest reasons for this is the ease of IO, and the type of communities that have formed around its use, like Newgrounds.
Re: Learning 80’s style programming today
#5After the first paragraph I thought this article was going to say how learning "80's style programming" isn't a good thing in the 2010s, rather than support that Python fits pretty well into it ;-) There's something to be said for 80's style educational style, but I'm not sure we should hang on to the same style of programming.
Re: Learning 80’s style programming today
#6After the first paragraph I thought this article was going to say how learning "80's style programming" isn't a good thing in the 2010s, rather than support that Python fits pretty well into it ;-) There's something to be said for 80's style educational style, but I'm not sure we should hang on to the same style of programming.
I keep seeing articles that worry about not being able to do this, and I just wanted to show that you pretty much could if you wanted to (no need to buy a C64 as the Salon article author did).
I think if someone asked me how to get started hacking around, I'd suggest HTML/Javascript or Processing. They both have the advantage of being very easy to deploy the output if you want (for sharing). They also have progressive enhancement (meaning you can start knowing only a few simple things and learn more as you need it)
Re: Learning 80’s style programming today
#7I am really unsympathetic to the idea that programming has gotten harder to get into. It has, but only because of the sheer explosion of alternatives drowning out programming, which is not the point people try to make. In absolutely terms it is still easy, and actually easier than ever. It was never easy, it was just one of a much smaller set of choices.
Further edit: It occurs to me I have a relevant anecdote. I was never able to get into assembler on the Commodore 64, having gotten as far as I really could with Basic. I actually had an assembler, but no documentation. I had no ability to get documentation, no idea where to find it, nobody to even ask, hardly any clue that I should be asking. I managed to wedge my computer a few times just typing some vaguely assemblish stuff into it, but no more. Today, www.google.com -> "Commodore 64 assembly" (no quotes) yields http://www.c64.ch/programming/ as the first hit.
Yeah, it's gotten a lot easier.
Re: Learning 80’s style programming today
#8I don't think flash gets enough credit in this regard. Despite its many flaws, the sheer volume of people exposed to programming concepts from tinkering with flash is enormous. I think one of the biggest reasons for this is the ease of IO, and the type of communities that have formed around its use, like Newgrounds.
And if you use haXe instead of Adobe's tools, it's not hard to put together a reasonably sane Flash development environment.
I agree, Flash is a decent choice for the same reasons BASIC was awesome in the 80s - kids love to make noises and draw/animate graphics. Javascript is catching up on the graphics front, but sound is sadly still just not there.
Re: Learning 80’s style programming today
#9After the first paragraph I thought this article was going to say how learning "80's style programming" isn't a good thing in the 2010s, rather than support that Python fits pretty well into it ;-) There's something to be said for 80's style educational style, but I'm not sure we should hang on to the same style of programming.
I keep seeing articles that worry about not being able to do this, and I just wanted to show that you pretty much could if you wanted to (no need to buy a C64 as the Salon article author did). I think if someone asked me how to get started hacking around, I'd suggest HTML/Javascript or Processing. They both have the advantage of being very easy to deploy the output if you want (for sharing). They also have progressiv…
I totally agree. I think you alluded to a certain amount of romanticism in those of us who learned to code in the 80s and I agree with that too. It takes a real effort to see beyond that and to come up with better, more relevant things.
Re: Learning 80’s style programming today
#10I am really unsympathetic to the idea that programming has gotten harder to get into. It has, but only because of the sheer explosion of alternatives drowning out programming, which is not the point people try to make. In absolutely terms it is still easy, and actually easier than ever. It was never easy , it was just one of a much smaller set of choices. Further edit: It occurs to me I have a relevant anecdote. I wa…
Not only that, but getting help is crazy easy nowadays. In the 80's you either had to know someone experienced in real life, buy books, or just pootle around figuring it out for yourself.