No more Mr. Nice Guy -- Robert Glover
Ask HN: Books you wish you had read earlier?
151–160 of 280 posts
Re: Ask HN: Books you wish you had read earlier?
#152Re: Ask HN: Books you wish you had read earlier?
#153The bible, cover to cover: if reading western literature or philosophy produced in whatever year A.D., the bible is required reading for comprehending many the references and various rhetorical modes. I'm irreligious from a muslim background myself but I'm reading it now. Same goes for the qoran, my family is not a practicing muslim family and thus I never read it, but it's a part of the canon, must be read. I'm not…
I think the secular perspective about the bible, Quran, and other Abrahamic sacred texts, is far more interesting than the contents within. This is the perspective so rarely visited by athiests, agnostics, or religious folks.
Re: Ask HN: Books you wish you had read earlier?
#154The book that I should have read (and re-read) earlier: No more Mr. Nice Guy -- Robert Glover
Re: Ask HN: Books you wish you had read earlier?
#155The bible, cover to cover: if reading western literature or philosophy produced in whatever year A.D., the bible is required reading for comprehending many the references and various rhetorical modes. I'm irreligious from a muslim background myself but I'm reading it now. Same goes for the qoran, my family is not a practicing muslim family and thus I never read it, but it's a part of the canon, must be read. I'm not…
Can you recommend a good English translation of the Qoran if it exists? I've asked Muslim friends but they seem adamant that it must be read in Arabic or, at least, only know of the Arabic text.
Re: Ask HN: Books you wish you had read earlier?
#156Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't know how people can read it, for me it's a pain to read more than a page. >the bible is required reading for comprehending many the references and various rhetorical modes I'm sure there are modern book about rhetorics
Why is that? Some of the language isn't all that easy to get through but, taken as a piece of literary work, I don't find it that unreadable.
Re: Ask HN: Books you wish you had read earlier?
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've seen this book recommended many times. I read a few chapters and don't feel like it was useful. Some of the stuff is obvious common sense like smile don't criticize others, be a good listener etc. Then it tells you to be genuinely interested in someone. How can you force yourself to be interested in someone? Does the book go into anything actually useful later on?
Some people are born communicators and find interaction with others completely intuitive. Others are born with a brain more ready to understand math, or writing screenplays, or software engineering, or business management - and bumble their way through communication, getting a lot wrong, not knowing where the lines are between their successes and failures, and generally having a miserable time. Books like these defin…
Look at the writings of Dr. Barbara Oakley or at https://www.coursera.org/learn/learning-how-to-learn.
Re: Ask HN: Books you wish you had read earlier?
#158The bible, cover to cover: if reading western literature or philosophy produced in whatever year A.D., the bible is required reading for comprehending many the references and various rhetorical modes. I'm irreligious from a muslim background myself but I'm reading it now. Same goes for the qoran, my family is not a practicing muslim family and thus I never read it, but it's a part of the canon, must be read. I'm not…
I don't know how people can read it, for me it's a pain to read more than a page. >the bible is required reading for comprehending many the references and various rhetorical modes I'm sure there are modern book about rhetorics
I was referring to the contents of rhetorical modes (allegories, metaphors, etc.), not their definitions.
Re: Ask HN: Books you wish you had read earlier?
#159Ctrl+F these names in this page for rationale.
Is there an "awesome books" repo on Github? I wonder.