Live data from Hacker News

Google Contributor: Buy an ad removal pass for the web

contributor.google.com

101–110 of 269 posts

Re: Google Contributor: Buy an ad removal pass for the web

#101
post #62
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I want a UBlock where in place of ads a single micro tipping facility is inserted. Maybe the website can remember this for the future, etc. I've done a few PayPal tips but it's just too clunky / unfit for purpose.

https://www.brave.com/

Ah, thanks, I saw it here before but forgot about it. Will check out now.

Re: Google Contributor: Buy an ad removal pass for the web

#102
post #62
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I want a UBlock where in place of ads a single micro tipping facility is inserted. Maybe the website can remember this for the future, etc. I've done a few PayPal tips but it's just too clunky / unfit for purpose.

https://www.brave.com/

[deleted]

Re: Google Contributor: Buy an ad removal pass for the web

#103

Whether it comes from Google, or someone else I believe this is the only way the web survives. Content creators need to be able to charge different amounts for different quality content. In depth, well researched reporting needs to be able to earn more than a buzzfeed article. That's not possible with a flat "per-eyeball" cost, where the revenue to the content creator is uncorrelated with the cost to create or the va…

Brave Software

Re: Google Contributor: Buy an ad removal pass for the web

#105

Whether it comes from Google, or someone else I believe this is the only way the web survives. Content creators need to be able to charge different amounts for different quality content. In depth, well researched reporting needs to be able to earn more than a buzzfeed article. That's not possible with a flat "per-eyeball" cost, where the revenue to the content creator is uncorrelated with the cost to create or the va…

>A model like this is necessary to support quality content online.

It's totally not. People essentially enjoy creating and sharing, and love putting up quality content about things they truly give a shit about.

The internet was built on people writing massive forums posts about completely stripping down Kawasaki motorbike engines, and hosting their own websites where they ramble about conditional probability. Wikipedia was written by unpaid but enthusiastic curators, and no one got paid for uploading popular Youtube videos until long after it was already a staple of the internet.

I totally and utterly refute your statement. The world came to the internet for the content that people made for free, because it was the best. It's still the best. After all, you're here reading the comments on hacker news, which we are all freely contributing too with no expectation of compensation.

Quality online content will not vanish if online advertising fails, because quality online content is posted by people who first and foremost /want to post content/. It'll move to different kinds of websites depending on how people want to access content at the time, but it will still be here, just as it always has been. What will vanish is all the mediocre spacefilling bullshit. The stuff so dull you _must_ pay someone to write it because no one would do it for fun or kudos.

Re: Google Contributor: Buy an ad removal pass for the web

#107
post #81

Cancelled already: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Contributor Google Contributor was a program run by Google that allowed users in the Google Network of content sites to view the websites without any advertisements that are administered, sorted, and maintained by Google. The program started with prominent websites, like The Onion and Mashable among others, to test this service. After November 2015, the program…

The first iteration was cancelled, this is the new iteration that launched yesterday.

This was already going to be a tough sell with major publishers.

If Google isn't willing to promise they'll keep it around for a couple years, it simply won't be worthwhile for publishers to invest the engineering (and legal resources) to do these deals and the integrations. I don't expect this latest incarnation to gain traction in its current form.

I do have hope for this subscription model still. If Google or someone else makes a serious go of it, I'll be cheering them on.

Re: Google Contributor: Buy an ad removal pass for the web

#108
post #37

Maybe if Google went with "Pay us $10 per month for us not to show you any AdSense anywhere on the web", this would be successful. In this form, I highly doubt it.

I wish they would launch this; I happily pay $10/month for YouTube Red right now for exactly this.

Re: Google Contributor: Buy an ad removal pass for the web

#109
post #37

Maybe if Google went with "Pay us $10 per month for us not to show you any AdSense anywhere on the web", this would be successful. In this form, I highly doubt it.

I wish they would launch this; I happily pay $10/month for YouTube Red right now for exactly this.

> I wish they would launch this; I happily pay $10/month for YouTube Red right now for exactly this.

And here I wish I could pay for YouTube Red.

From what I've heard, YouTube Red users get Google Play Music for free. Ironically, I pay Google more than $10 a month for Google Play Music alone, but they won't let me pay for YouTube Red, even if I want to.

Why? God knows.

If they're going to be the gatekeepers to paid online content, I'd be furious if they botch that one up too with the same kind of regional discrimination and limitations.

And knowing Google though, that's probably exactly what they're going to do. Because that's what they always do.

Re: Google Contributor: Buy an ad removal pass for the web

#110
We also thought about this at Steady (www.steadyHQ.com). We built a system for recurring payments to independent creators and some of our publishers allow users to pay for not bugging them with their adblocker detectors. This generates additional turnover from users that normally do not get served any ads b/c they use adblockers, but I believe such an offering should encompass all ads, not just Google AdSense (why would you pay just to reduce the amount of ads), and it should include removing paywalls (e.g. at a higher price point, to monetize "superfans").
Post reply on HN