Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Why don't more open-source projects monetize?

news.ycombinator.com

61–70 of 131 posts

Re: Ask HN: Why don't more open-source projects monetize?

#61
Because the need for monitization is a limitation. Take a game. You can try everything, but once you dev it for money- the whole shit-circues enters the town- making you think about the audience, the payroll, your family - and all these things limit you. In a very real way. Every naysayer who is applauded at a companys meeting tells you the answer why open source sometimes is more awesome. Because capitalism cant - and is afraid of risks.

Free as in un-bound software.

Re: Ask HN: Why don't more open-source projects monetize?

#63

I've been encouraging a 5% philosophy for organizations that replace software that had license fees with free software: Just donate 5% of the previous annual license fee to the project you're now using, each year. You still save 95% on license fees and developers get to eat.

I like this, but I can imagine it being a hard sell even at just 5%.

Re: Ask HN: Why don't more open-source projects monetize?

#64

Following the example of Sidekiq (with Sidekiq Pro), I'm in the process of launching a commercial offering for Kiba ETL (OSS Ruby ETL framework - http://www.kiba-etl.org ), dubbed "Kiba Pro". My take on this is that more developers could try to follow that path, but we lack a bit of guidance (I'm lucky Mike Perham provided some useful insights to guide me actually) to reduce the anxiety & uncertainty associated with…

I am in the process of doing something similar with rediSQL [https://github.com/RedBeardLab/rediSQL].

I would love any further feedback you can share.

Re: Ask HN: Why don't more open-source projects monetize?

#65

Because monetizing your open-source project means you take on a second job. Here are your choices: * Turn your OSS project into a company (Docker). The pro is that you can capture a lot of the value, the con is that you're splitting your project into CE/EE and also now you're a CEO * Give the software away for free and charge for the hosting (Gitlab). Pro here is that you get recurring revenue, but the con is that no…

Very good list. I would add that most open source projects have many people working on them.

So suppose you actually manage get paid despite all that -- how do you distribute money fairly? This is a huge problem can could actually slow the project down by leading to hurt feelings. Ironically, it's almost better for the group if nobody gets paid.

Corporations have evolved all sorts of imperfect systems to solve this problem, but it comes at a tremendous cost (performance reviews, interviews, firing, all of HR essentially).

But the open source model of collaboration follows the principle of "least bureaucracy". It throws out all these "coordination costs" in the name of just getting the job done. No more and no less.

Re: Ask HN: Why don't more open-source projects monetize?

#66
One important aspect is attracting contributors: Many potential contributors don't like investing time in a project, where one entity has a notable benefit from the unpaid work. If you don't have monitisation in mind in the project everybody interacts on an more equal level.

Re: Ask HN: Why don't more open-source projects monetize?

#67
post #56

Because monetizing any business is really really hard. I work on Standard Notes ( https://standardnotes.org ), which is an encrypted notes app (think of it as an encrypted Evernote alternative). It's fully open source, and I'm monetizing it through paid upgrades. While the progress is promising enough for me to continue working on it full time, nothing could have prepared me for how difficult this was going to be. I…

Your app looks sweet. Can I try out the extended version before purchasing?

Re: Ask HN: Why don't more open-source projects monetize?

#68

I've tried it. I've failed at it. Halite is a libsodium wrapper for PHP projects that emphasizes ease-of-use and difficulty to misuse: https://github.com/paragonie/halite CMS Airship is a secure-by-default content management system (think WordPress, Drupal, Joomla, etc.): https://github.com/paragonie/airship Both projects are released under GPL but offer commercial licenses. In two years, I've only had one person eve…

> But if you're trying to build a more secure Internet by giving developers better tools, nobody wants to pay you for that.

Sounds like you might enjoy working at https://protocol.ai/

Re: Ask HN: Why don't more open-source projects monetize?

#69

Following the example of Sidekiq (with Sidekiq Pro), I'm in the process of launching a commercial offering for Kiba ETL (OSS Ruby ETL framework - http://www.kiba-etl.org ), dubbed "Kiba Pro". My take on this is that more developers could try to follow that path, but we lack a bit of guidance (I'm lucky Mike Perham provided some useful insights to guide me actually) to reduce the anxiety & uncertainty associated with…

This is a process nearly every Enterprise oriented SaaS, a lot of which are built with Ruby/Rails. I think there is a lot of room for this to take off for you!

http://www.kiba-etl.org/ could use some work in stating the business problem and how Kiba can ease the pain of growing your own ETL. If you're not sure what an ETL is (or what problem they solve), the landing page provides 0 justification into reading more.

Re: Ask HN: Why don't more open-source projects monetize?

#70

I've tried it. I've failed at it. Halite is a libsodium wrapper for PHP projects that emphasizes ease-of-use and difficulty to misuse: https://github.com/paragonie/halite CMS Airship is a secure-by-default content management system (think WordPress, Drupal, Joomla, etc.): https://github.com/paragonie/airship Both projects are released under GPL but offer commercial licenses. In two years, I've only had one person eve…

> I rarely hear from it's users

that's not necessarily a bad thing. Those sound like libs with pretty simple responsibilities, so if they work great there may just not be any real opportunity for feature requests​ or feedback.

With a backported shim (like at least one of those), I'd honestly take a silent userbase as a sign of success if you know there are downloads/installs.

Post reply on HN