SCOTUS: Patent Rights Over a Printer Cartridge Are Exhausted When It Is Sold
1–10 of 319 posts
Re: SCOTUS: Patent Rights Over a Printer Cartridge Are Exhausted When It Is Sold
#2Some context for this consequential decision:
http://www.npr.org/2017/04/06/522826514/supreme-courts-decis...
Re: SCOTUS: Patent Rights Over a Printer Cartridge Are Exhausted When It Is Sold
#3[deleted]
Re: SCOTUS: Patent Rights Over a Printer Cartridge Are Exhausted When It Is Sold
#4The Planet Money podcast recently did an episode about this case: http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2017/03/31/522226226/episo...
Re: SCOTUS: Patent Rights Over a Printer Cartridge Are Exhausted When It Is Sold
#5> Gorsuch, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Does anyone know why this is?
Re: SCOTUS: Patent Rights Over a Printer Cartridge Are Exhausted When It Is Sold
#6> Gorsuch, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Does anyone know why this is?
Because the case got before the court before he was confirmed, likely.
Re: SCOTUS: Patent Rights Over a Printer Cartridge Are Exhausted When It Is Sold
#7> Gorsuch, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Does anyone know why this is?
He wasn't sworn in before oral arguments.
Re: SCOTUS: Patent Rights Over a Printer Cartridge Are Exhausted When It Is Sold
#8> Gorsuch, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Does anyone know why this is?
Justices typically recuse themselves from cases that pre-date their nomination.
Re: SCOTUS: Patent Rights Over a Printer Cartridge Are Exhausted When It Is Sold
#9Re: SCOTUS: Patent Rights Over a Printer Cartridge Are Exhausted When It Is Sold
#10> Gorsuch, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. Does anyone know why this is?
He has only been the court since April 2017. I would assume this was in review long before his arrival.