Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Ex-Founder. Should I take lowball buyout offer?

news.ycombinator.com

61–70 of 172 posts

Re: Ask HN: Ex-Founder. Should I take lowball buyout offer?

#61
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Selling existing shares does not raise money for the company. They have no more incentive to take this offer than to buy him out now.

Well, it makes an investor happy, because they received a 10% discount. Also, although it doesn't help the other founders that much, if one investor sells stock to another investor, it also doesn't HARM them at all. Why should they care if two investors trade shares between each other? If you own 5%, thats what you are. An investor.

Right, so why does it matter when it occurs?

Re: Ask HN: Ex-Founder. Should I take lowball buyout offer?

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Excellent advice and worth suggesting, but talk to the CEO first to make sure the company speaks with one voice otherwise you might imperil the funding round.

This. Ex-employees appearing out of the woodwork just before a funding round and wanting to divest all of their shares is definitely a scenario which (best case) gives the investors an extra weapon with which to put pressure on the valuation/terms of the deal and (worst case) could even get the deal called off completely. Even if you're not on great terms with your ex-cofounders, think of your ex-employees (and your…

That's not the worst case. The worst case is where the other shareholders sue you for damaging the company.

Re: Ask HN: Ex-Founder. Should I take lowball buyout offer?

#63
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Selling existing shares does not raise money for the company. They have no more incentive to take this offer than to buy him out now.

Yes they do. Cleaning up the captable at a discount is an extremely common thing during funding rounds, if they have to do it at a later date or as a separate transaction there is a lot of overhead. If it can be rolled in there is a much better chance of getting it done.

This supposed overhead is not worth >300 thousand dollars.

If I saw a founding member trying to divest himself at a 20% discount in a funding round for petty cash, I probably would find something else to invest in.

Re: Ask HN: Ex-Founder. Should I take lowball buyout offer?

#66
post #9

Set up a divesting schedule with regular payments based on the valuation of the company. The longer you're gone the less you have. If you've done work to get the company where it is then it's fair. I would not take a lump some in most cases.

Since the company is presumably still private, how would such a regularly scheduled divesting system work?

Re: Ask HN: Ex-Founder. Should I take lowball buyout offer?

#68
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes they do. Cleaning up the captable at a discount is an extremely common thing during funding rounds, if they have to do it at a later date or as a separate transaction there is a lot of overhead. If it can be rolled in there is a much better chance of getting it done.

This supposed overhead is not worth >300 thousand dollars. If I saw a founding member trying to divest himself at a 20% discount in a funding round for petty cash, I probably would find something else to invest in.

Not to you, but you don't matter. The investors and the other shareholders matter.

If the company is doing well in the eyes of the CEO, the remaining shareholders and the investors this is their chance to get a larger slice of the pie at a discount.

Founders are not by law or the shareholder agreement required to stay with the company across its lifecycle, and founders being bought out during funding rounds is common and does not immediately lead to investors bolting from the deal when presented with a good enough story behind it (such as someone wanting to move on, or being tired). It's actually quite rare to see a 5 year old company where all co-founders are still active and in their original roles. Nothing worse for a company than to have a bunch of ex-founders who no longer produce anything and that are holding on to sizable blocks of shares and that do not wish to sell. In investors parlance that's called 'dead wood' and the more you have of that the harder it will be to raise money.

Now if all of the founders want to take money of the table that is known as a buy-out and tends to be looked at differently, but even those deals are made, usually at some kind of discount. The version where other employees of the company elevate themselves to the C level is called an MBO and is also quite common.

Optionally there will a bank involved to fund part of the operating capital of the company depending on the amount and liquidity of the companies' assets.

Source: veteran of a bunch of deals involving my own company and being closely involved in another 50 M&A or investment deals or so, usually on the investors / buyers side.

Re: Ask HN: Ex-Founder. Should I take lowball buyout offer?

#69
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes they do. Cleaning up the captable at a discount is an extremely common thing during funding rounds, if they have to do it at a later date or as a separate transaction there is a lot of overhead. If it can be rolled in there is a much better chance of getting it done.

This supposed overhead is not worth >300 thousand dollars. If I saw a founding member trying to divest himself at a 20% discount in a funding round for petty cash, I probably would find something else to invest in.

Why?

Re: Ask HN: Ex-Founder. Should I take lowball buyout offer?

#70
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, it makes an investor happy, because they received a 10% discount. Also, although it doesn't help the other founders that much, if one investor sells stock to another investor, it also doesn't HARM them at all. Why should they care if two investors trade shares between each other? If you own 5%, thats what you are. An investor.

Right, so why does it matter when it occurs?

An investment round is a way for the company to aim for a higher future level than they would otherwise achieve. That's the moment when the shares are presumably the cheapest, and there is already a deal in progress so it is very easy and convenient to roll in another transaction. Since the lawyers are getting paid anyway and money is flowing at an established valuation it is an excellent moment to offer your shares.

Later on you might have to re-establish a valuation and you will have to make a lot of overhead on a relatively small transaction.

Post reply on HN