Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Moving to Front End Engineering after 10 years in back end, worth it?

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 41 posts

Ask HN: Moving to Front End Engineering after 10 years in back end, worth it?

#1
Have been working with Java, Scala and Ruby backend with some front end experience (Basic JS, HTML CSS). I now have an opportunity to work in depth on front end engineering.

The front end landscape has always seemed quite messy and fragmented to me, and honestly a bit scary too. I am fine with taking the leap of faith, but wanted HN community's opinion on whether it would be an enlightening experience. Is there something like "too late to move to front end"?

Re: Ask HN: Moving to Front End Engineering after 10 years in back end, worth it?

#3
post #2

Front-end is fast moving indeed. I don't have any definitive answers for you, other than to say that in the front-end vs. back-end equation, front-end is lot less stable and is going to require more time keeping up with new developments.

Indeed, there's a new shiny framework every other week.

Re: Ask HN: Moving to Front End Engineering after 10 years in back end, worth it?

#4
I've never understood the split between front end and back end.

Whenever I've assigned web work to developers I assign in terms of functionality and they write front and back. I think this is quicker than trying to communicate between two teams.

But to answer the question, why not. Then you're a full stack developer.

Re: Ask HN: Moving to Front End Engineering after 10 years in back end, worth it?

#6

I've never understood the split between front end and back end. Whenever I've assigned web work to developers I assign in terms of functionality and they write front and back. I think this is quicker than trying to communicate between two teams. But to answer the question, why not. Then you're a full stack developer.

This is like saying you never understood the split between a carpenter and a welder, when both are involved in producing the finished product of say, a cabinet.

Sure, for simple enough projects a single person can do both, but doing that severely limits your potential scope.

For more complex projects, it's more convenient to have someone who specializes in carpentry provide the specs for what the welder needs to provide.

Re: Ask HN: Moving to Front End Engineering after 10 years in back end, worth it?

#7

I've never understood the split between front end and back end. Whenever I've assigned web work to developers I assign in terms of functionality and they write front and back. I think this is quicker than trying to communicate between two teams. But to answer the question, why not. Then you're a full stack developer.

Difference between knowing it and being good at it. Knowing how to do a join query does not make you a full stack dev

Re: Ask HN: Moving to Front End Engineering after 10 years in back end, worth it?

#8
If by frontend you mean browser, the only difference between that and backend is the os you're dealing with (the browser).

If you can handle the fragmentation of unix environments, you can handle the fragmentation of frontend frameworks. You probably won't find any enlightenment though, unless you dive into gpu programming or such.

Re: Ask HN: Moving to Front End Engineering after 10 years in back end, worth it?

#9
I should warn you that employers tend to look at front end skills as an excuse to pay you less.

The upside is that they're much more transferable between companies. Everyone wants to hire experts in their current back end stack, but everyone needs CSS & JS.

Re: Ask HN: Moving to Front End Engineering after 10 years in back end, worth it?

#10
post #6

I've never understood the split between front end and back end. Whenever I've assigned web work to developers I assign in terms of functionality and they write front and back. I think this is quicker than trying to communicate between two teams. But to answer the question, why not. Then you're a full stack developer.

This is like saying you never understood the split between a carpenter and a welder, when both are involved in producing the finished product of say, a cabinet. Sure, for simple enough projects a single person can do both, but doing that severely limits your potential scope. For more complex projects, it's more convenient to have someone who specializes in carpentry provide the specs for what the welder needs to prov…

No, because a carpenter can't switch out for a welding torch with a hotkey. Nor can they woodwork with the torch.

The reason the fe/be distinction exists is mostly management, accounting, and legacy, not the actual work. These days the engineering itself can be interchangeable across the "ends", depending on the toolset you're using.

Post reply on HN