11–20 of 29 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've paid for the digital subscription for 15 years. What's the aversion to more people paying? Perhaps the price would go down.
Because if it's important, I'll hear about it somewhere else. And if it's interesting, I can find other articles. Content is a dime a dozen these days, why would I pay for it?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've paid for the digital subscription for 15 years. What's the aversion to more people paying? Perhaps the price would go down.
Because if it's important, I'll hear about it somewhere else. And if it's interesting, I can find other articles. Content is a dime a dozen these days, why would I pay for it?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've paid for the digital subscription for 15 years. What's the aversion to more people paying? Perhaps the price would go down.
I took advantage of the Post and NYT's price reduction. Paying something like $10-$15 a month is pretty much a no-brainer. But at $30, I don't know if I'd read it enough to justify the cost.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've paid for the digital subscription for 15 years. What's the aversion to more people paying? Perhaps the price would go down.
Because if it's important, I'll hear about it somewhere else. And if it's interesting, I can find other articles. Content is a dime a dozen these days, why would I pay for it?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I use the aptly-named "innocuous Chrome extension"
I've paid for the digital subscription for 15 years. What's the aversion to more people paying? Perhaps the price would go down.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've paid for the digital subscription for 15 years. What's the aversion to more people paying? Perhaps the price would go down.
Because I don't want to pay for any kind of media that is owned by News Corp.
Great I just now find out this existed and it is too late!
No worries, there's an easier way to get through that doesn't require a login at all.
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/xray/dgkdfehohjdbm...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've paid for the digital subscription for 15 years. What's the aversion to more people paying? Perhaps the price would go down.
Because if it's important, I'll hear about it somewhere else. And if it's interesting, I can find other articles. Content is a dime a dozen these days, why would I pay for it?
Meanwhile, OTHER people-- security researches, trolls, whoever-- some maybe have told the media about private data being shared on open links-- they get to go to jail.
It's almost like criminal laws are selectively enforced against people who corporate and powerful special interests don't like, and flagrantly ignored when broken by members of the establishment.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because if it's important, I'll hear about it somewhere else. And if it's interesting, I can find other articles. Content is a dime a dozen these days, why would I pay for it?
Because if you're not paying for it, someone else is paying for it to be shown to you.