Live data from Hacker News

Florida GOP consultant admits he worked with Guccifer 2.0, analyzing hacked data

arstechnica.com

1–10 of 87 posts

Re: Florida GOP consultant admits he worked with Guccifer 2.0, analyzing hacked data

#4
post #3

So the GOP is directly admitting to collusion with Russian agents in order to disrupt US elections. Are we OK with this as a country?

I'd wager that in the abstract the answer is "NO!"

But then again IOKIYAR probably takes precedence here... And the Republicans are in charge of all the checks/balances at the moment.

Re: Florida GOP consultant admits he worked with Guccifer 2.0, analyzing hacked data

#5
post #3

So the GOP is directly admitting to collusion with Russian agents in order to disrupt US elections. Are we OK with this as a country?

How is this collusion with Russians? This is Fake News. Stop and think for a while if a news perfectly fits the cognitive biases of your echo chamber.

Re: Florida GOP consultant admits he worked with Guccifer 2.0, analyzing hacked data

#7
Ok, for a report with the possible meaning and impact as this, to have zero dates, no timeframe at all, is either very cagey or very "rush this online!". I'll assume oversight before incompetence. However, given the piece as written, these communications could have happened years ago or yesterday (hyperbole I know but ???)

Re: Florida GOP consultant admits he worked with Guccifer 2.0, analyzing hacked data

#9
post #7

Ok, for a report with the possible meaning and impact as this, to have zero dates, no timeframe at all, is either very cagey or very "rush this online!". I'll assume oversight before incompetence. However, given the piece as written, these communications could have happened years ago or yesterday (hyperbole I know but ???)

As long as it gaslights the far far far left communist to generate enough outrage, it has done its job.

Re: Florida GOP consultant admits he worked with Guccifer 2.0, analyzing hacked data

#10
post #7

Ok, for a report with the possible meaning and impact as this, to have zero dates, no timeframe at all, is either very cagey or very "rush this online!". I'll assume oversight before incompetence. However, given the piece as written, these communications could have happened years ago or yesterday (hyperbole I know but ???)

Are you talking about the ArsTechnica article, or its Wall Street Journal source? (Which I can't read because of the paywall)
Post reply on HN