I'm a psychiatrist, and there are a few things to consider about this story: 1. The bulk of people in a psychiatric hospital are there voluntarily. They can walk out the door at any time. 2. When a patient is in a hospital involuntarily, their stay is subject to state laws about involuntary hospitalization. This, as far as I know, universally requires 2 independent professional opinions that a patient is actively sui…
Correction: psychiatric stays are generally very short with private insurance, and months long with state insurance. May vary with the level of corruption in your area.
Feds probing psychiatric hospitals for locking in patients to boost profits
21–30 of 89 posts
Re: Feds probing psychiatric hospitals for locking in patients to boost profits
#22A great example of how for-profit healthcare (or anything else) can fail. Corporate entities have an obligation to do whatever they can legally get away with in order to maximize profits. They do not have a prerogative to benefit society, or help human beings apart from what they choose to do. Every country has to decide whether the benefits of privatisation of the various services outweighs the societal costs caused…
And if you want to see examples of how government run healthcare (or anything else) can fail, just look at the history of atrocities of public psychiatric hospitals.
Re: Feds probing psychiatric hospitals for locking in patients to boost profits
#23Looking forward to charges of fraud and, where applicable, imprisonment under false pretenses[1], resulting in stiff prison sentences for those responsible. [1]: The notion that psychiatric hospitals should be able to keep people there against their will is extremely suspect. A possible exception is a patient being convicted in court of an actual crime, and sent there instead of to prison by the legal system. Even th…
It is necessary to some extent because of the impact that mental and psychiatric conditions have on the will itself. But some patient-appointed external agent with formal qualifications and the power to balance decisions, even if imperfect, would go a long ways.
Re: Feds probing psychiatric hospitals for locking in patients to boost profits
#24Looking forward to charges of fraud and, where applicable, imprisonment under false pretenses[1], resulting in stiff prison sentences for those responsible. [1]: The notion that psychiatric hospitals should be able to keep people there against their will is extremely suspect. A possible exception is a patient being convicted in court of an actual crime, and sent there instead of to prison by the legal system. Even th…
> The notion that psychiatric hospitals should be able to keep people there against their will is extremely suspect It is necessary to some extent because of the impact that mental and psychiatric conditions have on the will itself. But some patient-appointed external agent with formal qualifications and the power to balance decisions, even if imperfect, would go a long ways.
Re: Feds probing psychiatric hospitals for locking in patients to boost profits
#25A great example of how for-profit healthcare (or anything else) can fail. Corporate entities have an obligation to do whatever they can legally get away with in order to maximize profits. They do not have a prerogative to benefit society, or help human beings apart from what they choose to do. Every country has to decide whether the benefits of privatisation of the various services outweighs the societal costs caused…
I love how people generally agree upon this, but when it comes to specific topics, they seem to have a blind spot for this. For ex. Vaccines and how people seem to blindly believe what ever the authority tells them...
I mean. Look at this thread.
https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/6c5k10/italy_mak...
I don't really expect the crowd here to be much better...but anyways...
Re: Feds probing psychiatric hospitals for locking in patients to boost profits
#26Secondly, go fuck yourself, don't try to cover up involuntary restraint and criminal behavior.
Re: Feds probing psychiatric hospitals for locking in patients to boost profits
#27This is one of my greatest fears: that I'll be labelled as insane, then taken away and locked up against my will, and when I try to plead sanity, nobody will believe me. Because they "know" I'm insane.
Re: Feds probing psychiatric hospitals for locking in patients to boost profits
#28Two items, this is nothing new, although it is good to see it getting news and federal attention. 20 years ago, as a minor, I was subjected to delayed releases as well as odd provocations from the care workers. In the end it took a parent rebelling and pulling me out against medical advice. Secondly, go fuck yourself, don't try to cover up involuntary restraint and criminal behavior.
Re: Feds probing psychiatric hospitals for locking in patients to boost profits
#29Two items, this is nothing new, although it is good to see it getting news and federal attention. 20 years ago, as a minor, I was subjected to delayed releases as well as odd provocations from the care workers. In the end it took a parent rebelling and pulling me out against medical advice. Secondly, go fuck yourself, don't try to cover up involuntary restraint and criminal behavior.
Re: Feds probing psychiatric hospitals for locking in patients to boost profits
#30I'm a psychiatrist, and there are a few things to consider about this story: 1. The bulk of people in a psychiatric hospital are there voluntarily. They can walk out the door at any time. 2. When a patient is in a hospital involuntarily, their stay is subject to state laws about involuntary hospitalization. This, as far as I know, universally requires 2 independent professional opinions that a patient is actively sui…
In South-Africa you have to beg private hospitals to admit patients with certain psychiatric conditions. The default is to send patients to public hospitals, and that will likely involve much more restraint and much less care.
My respect goes out to people that keep on trying to deal with these situations with limited resources.