GNU Guix and GuixSD 0.13.0 released
11–20 of 37 posts
Re: GNU Guix and GuixSD 0.13.0 released
#12Re: GNU Guix and GuixSD 0.13.0 released
#13Any experiences with using GuixSD as a main distribution for a standard laptop working environment? I have been using Debian Sid for more than a decade but the idea of having a system fully configured via reproducible pure Scheme functions is tempting for sure...
Re: GNU Guix and GuixSD 0.13.0 released
#14Any experiences with using GuixSD as a main distribution for a standard laptop working environment? I have been using Debian Sid for more than a decade but the idea of having a system fully configured via reproducible pure Scheme functions is tempting for sure...
I have been using GuixSD on my Thinkpad X220 for about 2 years now and it is has been good overall. I have fairly simple needs: GNOME 3, Emacs, Firefox (called IceCat in GuixSD). The full system rollback feature has been very handy at times when I do something terrible to my OS configuration file and just want to move on to other things.
How 'recent' are the packages?
I care for little things, but say.. libvirt or Firefox would be something I'd like to keep quite up to date. Is it possible to run Firefox (not Iceweasel)?
Do you use any 'unfree' packages and how much hassle is it to acquire those?
Re: GNU Guix and GuixSD 0.13.0 released
#15Congrats on the release. I use GNU Guix ontop of Fedora to use some extra packages as well as commands like `guix environment` to set up a dev environment to work on projects.
Re: GNU Guix and GuixSD 0.13.0 released
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have been using GuixSD on my Thinkpad X220 for about 2 years now and it is has been good overall. I have fairly simple needs: GNOME 3, Emacs, Firefox (called IceCat in GuixSD). The full system rollback feature has been very handy at times when I do something terrible to my OS configuration file and just want to move on to other things.
I I may (I hope I'm not coming across as rude, I'm genuinely interested in running GuixSD): How 'recent' are the packages? I care for little things, but say.. libvirt or Firefox would be something I'd like to keep quite up to date. Is it possible to run Firefox (not Iceweasel)? Do you use any 'unfree' packages and how much hassle is it to acquire those?
Re: GNU Guix and GuixSD 0.13.0 released
#17What is the current position of guix Vs mix? Is one clearly more popular? Is one "winning" or is this more of a Debian Vs redhat, where both can continue to exist?
Disclaimer: I have been working on Guix since 2014 and use it in production. Guix and Nix are both implementations of the functional package management idea. Nix has been around for quite a few more years than Guix. In Guix package expressions are first-class and the DSL is embedded in Guile, a general purpose language, so packaging has a very different feel to it. It also allows for fun tools like "guix graph". Guix…
Re: GNU Guix and GuixSD 0.13.0 released
#18Congrats on the release. I use GNU Guix ontop of Fedora to use some extra packages as well as commands like `guix environment` to set up a dev environment to work on projects.
How easy/hard is it to manage? Does it conflict with Yum?
Re: GNU Guix and GuixSD 0.13.0 released
#19Any experiences with using GuixSD as a main distribution for a standard laptop working environment? I have been using Debian Sid for more than a decade but the idea of having a system fully configured via reproducible pure Scheme functions is tempting for sure...
Re: GNU Guix and GuixSD 0.13.0 released
#20Any experiences with using GuixSD as a main distribution for a standard laptop working environment? I have been using Debian Sid for more than a decade but the idea of having a system fully configured via reproducible pure Scheme functions is tempting for sure...
My needs are simple: emacs, Clojure (with Icedtea), Icecat and StumpWM. Plus all the guile goodness!
Just realized I'm living in a system with four Lisps front and center (guile, Common Lisp, elisp, and Clojure)