Microsoft will make the most from WannaCry
1–10 of 74 posts
Re: Microsoft will make the most from WannaCry
#2Re: Microsoft will make the most from WannaCry
#3Paywalled. Workaround it by pasting the URL into Google and clicking the link there.
Re: Microsoft will make the most from WannaCry
#4Re: Microsoft will make the most from WannaCry
#5Re: Microsoft will make the most from WannaCry
#6Only way I got around the paywall was pasting the URL into Google then clicking 'Cached' version.
Re: Microsoft will make the most from WannaCry
#7Re: Microsoft will make the most from WannaCry
#8Re: Microsoft will make the most from WannaCry
#9I personally think that it's great to get the message across that people need to keep their operating systems up-to-date. I see too many non-technical people thinking in dangerous ways:
* "I don't want to update software, because the new software could have bugs which might be a security risk." I used to work for a well-known Fortune 500 that thought this way. But _all_ software is vulnerable in one way or another and by keeping it up to date, you also get the most recent security patches. Software vendors generally aren't putting major resources into securing old versions of their software.
* "I've got anti-virus software installed on my computer and we've got a firewall on our network". And maybe that will help you at some point, but if you don't update your OS, that's like having bullet-proof windows and leaving your front door unlocked.
Re: Microsoft will make the most from WannaCry
#10TLDR: Microsoft is using WannaCry as an opportunity to complain about the NSA and as an opportunity to tell people they need to update their software. I personally think that it's great to get the message across that people need to keep their operating systems up-to-date. I see too many non-technical people thinking in dangerous ways: * "I don't want to update software, because the new software could have bugs which…
The rust package manager issue that was on HN the other week comes to mind, where a package called NUL (I think) wreaked havoc on Windows systems because of backwards compatibility with DOS.
My point is: why rush to upgrade when you've got "support" anyway? For varying definitions of support.