Live data from Hacker News

The Boring Company FAQ

boringcompany.com

51–60 of 472 posts

Re: The Boring Company FAQ

#51
post #21

This is FANTASTIC! It's important to understand how massive the Earth is (even though it's a pinprick when compared to the sun). You can EASILY go 3-D or deep. The deepest mines in the world are around 12,000 feet deep. This is about 6x the height of the tallest building in the world (2000 feet tall). Imagine, thus, putting in a tunnel at what would be every 5th floor of a skyscraper and that you could fit 6 skyscrap…

I'm digging the tunnel love shown here.

Re: The Boring Company FAQ

#52

The old strategy of hiding your outlandish claim in an assertion in the first sentence! "To solve the problem of soul-destroying traffic, roads must go 3D" The word "must" is a very strong one here, there are other options: * Reduce the amount of travel that people need to do (remote work, online shopping). * Reduce the density of cities (enabled by remote work or longer commutes with better internet access). * Incre…

All those things you propose are controlled by individual companies or the government. Musk is only doing what he thinks he can to reduce traffic.

Re: The Boring Company FAQ

#53
post #33
post #9

Doesn't a tunnel under a building significantly increase the chances of the building falling down? What about flooding?

No clue why this is downvoted, these are valid concerns. Measuring and avoiding ground settlement consumes an enormous amount of engineering and contracting resources in every urban tunneling job. Flooding too can lead to work stoppages or long delays. You should have seen the Queens Bored Tunnels and Structures Project after Hurricane Sandy. It was pretty soupy. Source: Was a tunnel boring engineer in NYC, where we…

Any large project is likely to have difficulties of some sort that need to be taken into account to overcome: it's the nature of the beast. You're right, these are valid concerns. Asking the questions as your parent does implies that those at the Boring Company—while they may have not solved them in all cases—are not aware of them, especially as these aren't new problems. I speculate that the downvotes are a reflection that your parent isn't granting them this benefit of the doubt. One can infer from the FAQ that they are thinking of this in part from the R&D bullet point:

> Tunneling R&D. In the United States, there is virtually no investment in tunneling Research and Development (and in many other forms of construction). Thus, the construction industry is one of the only sectors in our economy that has not improved its productivity in the last 50 years.

Re: The Boring Company FAQ

#54
> The Boring Company is investigating technologies that will recycle the earth into useful bricks to be used to build structures. This is not a new concept, as buildings have been constructed from Earth for thousands of years including, according to recent evidence, the Pyramids.

Yesssss.

Re: The Boring Company FAQ

#55
So in the concept video it shows passengers loading on to a sled at surface level that can hold maybe a dozen people, and then it descends on an elevator 50 metres to the tube and goes down the line. This sounds cost effective compared to a full on underground subway station, which really aren't cheap to build even if you 10x the cost of tunneling, but it isn't good for much unless all those passengers intend to also get off at the same stop, which isn't really something that happens. So if one of those dozen passengers wants to get off, then all 12 will have to go all the way back up to the surface and back down again, which could end up being cripplingly slow.

Re: The Boring Company FAQ

#56

I'm more interested in the nuances of tunneling, like how they'll handle water seepage and flooding. Flooding is actually a huge problem with climate change causing larger and more frequent major weather events. After Hurricane Sandy, it took almost a week to reopen the subway tunnels. I can just imagine the kind of kinetic force that'll occur if a sled carrying a car slams into a section that has a few feet of water…

There's a Quartz piece about how Musk conceives all of his ventures that goes into some detail about the considerations behind The Boring Company, but the issue you mention is one of the ones where the technology still needs to advance, I believe.

Re: The Boring Company FAQ

#57

This does not answer the most obvious and important question: why not invest in public transport? It's boring but it will work.

I am not being facetious when I say "it won't help establish humanity on Mars".

Quite the contrary. The colonies must be builded underground to protect them from radiation and cold, so boring'll be used a lot.

Re: The Boring Company FAQ

#58

The old strategy of hiding your outlandish claim in an assertion in the first sentence! "To solve the problem of soul-destroying traffic, roads must go 3D" The word "must" is a very strong one here, there are other options: * Reduce the amount of travel that people need to do (remote work, online shopping). * Reduce the density of cities (enabled by remote work or longer commutes with better internet access). * Incre…

Musk is proposing a technology. You are proposing social(ist?) ideas.

Re: The Boring Company FAQ

#59

The old strategy of hiding your outlandish claim in an assertion in the first sentence! "To solve the problem of soul-destroying traffic, roads must go 3D" The word "must" is a very strong one here, there are other options: * Reduce the amount of travel that people need to do (remote work, online shopping). * Reduce the density of cities (enabled by remote work or longer commutes with better internet access). * Incre…

The "problem of soul-destroying traffic" will exist for as long as driving remains the best all-round option. It's induced demand: build more roads > capacity increases > driving becomes easier > traffic increases until driving is as hard as it was.

Add a congestion charge or tolls, and a proper public transport network. The solution is not more roads, it's fewer cars.

Post reply on HN