Live data from Hacker News

Screen sharing comes to Slack video calls

slackhq.com

91–100 of 177 posts

Re: Screen sharing comes to Slack video calls

#91

As someone else mentioned, they are finally doing some more with their purchase of Screen Hero most likely. However, one major feature that Screen Hero had that I don't _THINK_ this new screen sharing built in Slack has, is the ability for the other person to control the mouse/keyboard on your screen. I could be wrong, but if that is the case it's a huge feature missing. That was one of my favorite things that Screen…

It does not have interactive sharing. You still need Screenhero for that.

Re: Screen sharing comes to Slack video calls

#92
post #26

As someone else mentioned, they are finally doing some more with their purchase of Screen Hero most likely. However, one major feature that Screen Hero had that I don't _THINK_ this new screen sharing built in Slack has, is the ability for the other person to control the mouse/keyboard on your screen. I could be wrong, but if that is the case it's a huge feature missing. That was one of my favorite things that Screen…

I like Slack but I'm bit hesitant to have it the ability to control my mouse and keyboard all the time. Slack is so popular that there are certainly lot attacks against it and that could be one of the biggest exploits. I really hope operating system side sandboxing features mature and I'm able to control if and when software has access to such features.

We can finally replicate the way movies show "hacking" where the hacker starts controlling the kb + mouse and typing "HELLO MR SMITH. YOU HAVE BEEN HACKED" in 128px font.

Re: Screen sharing comes to Slack video calls

#94

I'm curious. I've used Screen Hero, Webex, Google Hangouts, and GotoMeeting extensively. People evoke a lot of love for Screen Hero and I can never figure out why. Video quality is pretty awful and pixellated. I don't see a single feature in Screen Hero that isn't in the other ones and the other ones have many more features that I use.

i wonder why people down voted you. you're asking valid questions... I'm starting to see a recurring pattern on HN. If you say something that somehow goes against "HN ideology", you get downvoted. Anyone else see this too? oh wait... watch me get downvoted too...

It's because "I don't see a single feature in Screenhero that others don't have."

Which is just incorrect. Screenhero has interactive screen sharing while the others don't. Or course he qualified it with "I don't see.." however, that tells me that he never used Screenhero and thus really doesn't have much credibility when critiquing it.

Express all the opinions you want, but they ought to be based on facts.

Re: Screen sharing comes to Slack video calls

#95

I see mentions of Screen Hero in a way that makes it sound like it's dead, but my team still uses SH daily (via Slack's `/hero` command). It's easily the best _remote pairing_ tool that I've found. This new Slack feature seems like something different, for presenting content to everyone on a call, not for collaborating on code.

You are correct that Screen Hero still works and all, but it is technically "dead." No one new can sign up for the service. You can only use it if you already had it setup. I would personally consider that "dead" if it's now closed off for anyone to signup with. It's not like you can recommend this as alternative to what Slack is doing with their screen sharing. On https://screenhero.com/login they even say "New sign…

I heard on The Bikeshed podcast that if you have a Screen Hero account you can invite others to sign up.

Re: Screen sharing comes to Slack video calls

#96

We're a Microsoft shop so we use Skype for Business, which seems to work well for talk/IM/screen sharing. Now we're getting "Teams" to be slacker. I'd be curious to hear how the Slack video/screen sharing compares to Skype Business, after a rocky start it's working pretty smoothly for us now.

"work well" in Lync is usually not what it sounds like

Re: Screen sharing comes to Slack video calls

#97
post #77

We're a Microsoft shop so we use Skype for Business, which seems to work well for talk/IM/screen sharing. Now we're getting "Teams" to be slacker. I'd be curious to hear how the Slack video/screen sharing compares to Skype Business, after a rocky start it's working pretty smoothly for us now.

We tried Teams and returned to Slack. Broken notifications and horrible SharePoint magic behind the scenes. The way Teams is organized confused some of my team. Interestingly, we also had a lot of problems with Skype for Business. The dark theme and the way Teams formats while you type was great, though!

We're trying it out now (since it's included with o365) and I find it mostly usable. It has most of the things I need (group (video) calls, screen share, search, files tab etc). My biggest complaint has been the random glitches you run into every now then (repeatedly being logged out for no reason comes to mind). That and the slowness (i'll often see a lag between when I've hit return and when my message shows up in the conversation). Hope someone from Teams is reading this :).

Re: Screen sharing comes to Slack video calls

#98
post #79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hangout's encoding also it's a real performance hog because most devices don't support H.264 in hardware. Every time I'm in a hangout the fans come on and the battery rapidly drops towards zero.

Most devices DO support H.264 encoding. Hangouts however uses VP9 in Chrome and that's not HW accelerated. If you use Safari on Mac it'll switch to H264 and that will stress CPU less.

It has exactly the same problem in Safari on mac in my experience. Battery is dead in about 10 minutes.

Re: Screen sharing comes to Slack video calls

#99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

i wonder why people down voted you. you're asking valid questions... I'm starting to see a recurring pattern on HN. If you say something that somehow goes against "HN ideology", you get downvoted. Anyone else see this too? oh wait... watch me get downvoted too...

It's because "I don't see a single feature in Screenhero that others don't have." Which is just incorrect. Screenhero has interactive screen sharing while the others don't. Or course he qualified it with "I don't see.." however, that tells me that he never used Screenhero and thus really doesn't have much credibility when critiquing it. Express all the opinions you want, but they ought to be based on facts.

What do you mean by "interactive screen sharing"? AFAIK both WebEx and GotoMeeting allow for remote control of a PC.

Re: Screen sharing comes to Slack video calls

#100

I see mentions of Screen Hero in a way that makes it sound like it's dead, but my team still uses SH daily (via Slack's `/hero` command). It's easily the best _remote pairing_ tool that I've found. This new Slack feature seems like something different, for presenting content to everyone on a call, not for collaborating on code.

You are correct that Screen Hero still works and all, but it is technically "dead." No one new can sign up for the service. You can only use it if you already had it setup. I would personally consider that "dead" if it's now closed off for anyone to signup with. It's not like you can recommend this as alternative to what Slack is doing with their screen sharing. On https://screenhero.com/login they even say "New sign…

You can sign up with your slack account though. They shut down general sign-ins but I just set this up for a project and it requires a paid slack account to be a new user to Screen Hero. I really hope all the killer features of SH (users having unique mouse/keyboard via screenshare) make their way into Slack before it is shut down entirely.
Post reply on HN