Live data from Hacker News

Working at Netflix 2017

brendangregg.com

41–50 of 162 posts

Re: Working at Netflix 2017

#42
post #4

Are they still proud of high turn-over rate and the "culture of fear"?

What makes you think the Netflix turnover rate is high? I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying that I have not personally experienced it. I've been at Netflix for a little less than 2 years. We've had zero turnover in my immediate group (the team that runs the OS used on the OpenConnect Appliance), and very little turnover in adjacent teams. I experienced far more turnover at Google.

[deleted]

Re: Working at Netflix 2017

#43
post #11

Netflix's culture deck is one of the most horrific things in the tech industry I've ever seen. It's so ruthlessly mercenary, I have a hard time understanding how why people put up with them.

I found it very appealing. I loved the bit that was something like: we're professionals working together, a sports team, not a family.

Re: Working at Netflix 2017

#44
post #11

Netflix's culture deck is one of the most horrific things in the tech industry I've ever seen. It's so ruthlessly mercenary, I have a hard time understanding how why people put up with them.

I found it very appealing. I loved the bit that was something like: we're professionals working together, a sports team, not a family.

Re: Working at Netflix 2017

#45
post #4

Are they still proud of high turn-over rate and the "culture of fear"?

A colleague already commented, but I too haven't personally experienced a high turn-over rate or a culture of fear. The culture is really great. On my team we're mostly the same as we were when I joined 3 years ago. We've added a few, and lost one. There is a turn-over rate, but what does one mean by high?

Re: Working at Netflix 2017

#46
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't see anything controversial about encrypting media you rent. The whole canard about DRM is that you don't own the media. You're not paying for ownership of Netflix videos. You're paying for access.

I've always thought that streaming services' main goal should be to be more convenient than digital piracy. That's when they win- when the service provides such a clear advantage over piracy that people are happy to pay money for it. At the moment, aside from ethical qualms, it is often more convenient for Linux, FF, and Chrome users to pirate Netflix's content. DRM, ironically, promotes piracy.

Also, Netflix's library is incredibly small compared to the amount of shows people actually watch. Netflix now blocks rooted Android devices. Netflix's originals are mostly terrible. So piracy vs $10/month for so much less is just painful. They don't allow anything more than 720p on chrome quite ironic considering the widevine deal. So yes, it seems Netflix is much more inconvenient than piracy.

Re: Working at Netflix 2017

#47

Netflix has a 3.4 rating on Glassdoor. Yikes. I wouldn't consider working at a company unless it had 4 or more.

I would never use Glassdoor for evaluating a company. It skews towards people who are upset, they don't verify that you actually worked there, and they combine hourly workers with salary workers, which could be two very different experiences.

Re: Working at Netflix 2017

#49
post #30

I'm pretty sure I've had few recruiters tell me, poaching from Netflix is almost impossible because of their ridiculously high salaries.

When you factor in stocks, bonuses, healthcare and benefits the pay is same as in any other big N companies. Add family-friendliness, job stability to the list and you have much more than Netflix offers.

Re: Working at Netflix 2017

#50
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Our TPM worked at Netflix for 2 years and she said that she personally saw about 20 people let go during her time.

I could understand this if interviews were broken (in a different way) at Netflix - is this the case? i.e. is it ridiculously easy to get a job there?

I wouldn't say it's easy to get a job here. I've been working here for nearly 2 years now.

The interview process is as challenging as it needs to be to find the right people for the job. This varies from team to team. We don't follow a corporate set of rules to hire engineers.

This company is more adamant about letting folks go whom don't get the work done or aren't able to perform.

They want good engineers to solve challenging problems. The teams are fairly lean so you can't really float by doing the bare minimum.

Post reply on HN