Live data from Hacker News

A Look Inside Apple’s New Campus

wired.com

271–280 of 440 posts

Re: A Look Inside Apple’s New Campus

#271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Why don't they have a child care facility? That decision was made by a man?

That's an obnoxious, sexist statement implying that men don't have at least equal concern as women for the well being & care of their children.

maybe he should write childless man working in IT, I would not be a bit surprised

Re: A Look Inside Apple’s New Campus

#272

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We usually hate when companies do this. Let's change the wording just a bit and see: ... the idea that Comcast couldn't possibly have any influence over municipal policies is laughable.

is Comcast one of the most famous companies in world having few hundred billion of cash available? since i am hardly familiar with them (ISP, carrier?) outside US i doubt that it's like thinking Microsoft can't make things done in Redmond or Google in Palo alto

The point is we don't want companies to do this, so why expect that Apple should?

Re: A Look Inside Apple’s New Campus

#273

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Everyone would jump on board if the city would just allocate the parking revenues to the home or building owners.

Where has this successfully been implemented? There's a similar mechanism to what you proposed, resident-only parking permits. This pits the business owners against the residents. It also means that a resident can't have their friends come to visit without risking a ticket. The knee-jerk HN-ism of quick fixes doesn't work here. The only actual solution is the long-term dual-pronged approach: parking structures in the…

Resident only parking permits is nothing like private parking meters.

Re: A Look Inside Apple’s New Campus

#274
post #19

I am wondering why I find it kind of odd that it doesn't have a childcare center.

It's much harder to estimate the demand of a child care center than that of a gym or a cafeteria. Not every employee will become a parent and those who do so will only have one or two children in the lifetime. On top of that, some would prefer an outside child care service, specially if the position has a lot of traveling involved (can your partner or caregiver bring the kid to campus when you are not there?) Even if…

> It's much harder to estimate the demand of a child care center than that of a gym or a cafeteria. Not every employee will become a parent and those who do so will only have one or two children in the lifetime.

not every employee (most?) is interested in gym, so why provide gym? you can make survey or research to estimate what size of childcare you will need

> On top of that, some would prefer an outside child care service, specially if the position has a lot of traveling involved (can your partner or caregiver bring the kid to campus when you are not there?) Even if you decide to do it. ¿How many people should you hire? ¿What happens when the employee is fired or quits? (it's hard to find a daycare center in short time), add insurance, etc...

just put in contract childcare ends same time as contract, simple as that, it's just bullshit excuse not provide option hiding it behind caring about well-being of employee

Re: A Look Inside Apple’s New Campus

#275
post #95

I'd wish they were a bit more futuristic than having 9000 parking spaces. Why not offer buses from where their employees live or other means of transportation? It's easy to say that most people drive, but that's only because everyone always make that the most convenient mode of transportation. With some effort something else could be even more convenient.

It's a bit of damned if they don't and damned if they do. FB, GOOG get flack for their shuttle busses plus if you get there later in the day parking in MTV is dicey. At least if you wanna drive, you can, if you wanna ride the bike, no one's stopping you.

Yea, I don't get it. Office parking is supposedly bad, but when GOOG sends around buses to reduce congestion/parking issues, they are bad as well?

Re: A Look Inside Apple’s New Campus

#276
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Easy to be cynical, hard to admire? No. It's easy to be a fanboy, hard to take an honest look at how this is just a prettier beehive for the drones.

Since you didn't read the article and don't know what the "beehive" is really like, it's easy to be cynical.

Why would you make wrong assumptions about what other people have read?

Re: A Look Inside Apple’s New Campus

#277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I charge around $70/hour for that kind of work, which tends to be a mix of CAD, CAM, Setup, Lifting/moving crap, packaging, and cleanup. Usually 1 hour minimum. I charge more for work in MDF because of the mess and because the dust is harder to clean up/get rid of and it is heavier. More again for aluminum. If I need to make whole assemblies with glue, finishing, etc, I tend to just go fixed bid. It's not super scien…

I didn't answer your full question - I didn't charge more based on the client. Just standard, and it took me ~8 hours of work. Turned out to be a great learning experience. (making those puzzle joints caused a revelation: .25" diameter bits are frequently, and irregularly, not .25". Most of mine end up being around .242" Once you compensate for that in CAD, things fit together nicely. )

Try switching from woodworking bits to metal working bits. An end mill will be 0.2500 with probably a minus tolerance of a tenth or two.

The wood bits might be undersized to accommodate tearing of the grain and sanding.

Re: A Look Inside Apple’s New Campus

#278

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where has this successfully been implemented? There's a similar mechanism to what you proposed, resident-only parking permits. This pits the business owners against the residents. It also means that a resident can't have their friends come to visit without risking a ticket. The knee-jerk HN-ism of quick fixes doesn't work here. The only actual solution is the long-term dual-pronged approach: parking structures in the…

Japan, for one: http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2016/08/the... . Washington State also makes some zoning decisions and targets some growth targets at the state level (see http://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?a... , although I can't find a better piece off the top of my head), which helps matters. The only actual solution is the long-term dual-pronged approach: parking structures…

Please don't link-bomb me in order to "win". Explain, with citations.

Your Japan link is not applicable to this conversation (though I love that article, it comes up whenever NIMBY stuff is discussed on HN). I consider that arguing in bad faith.

Zoning isn't going to magically help residents get parking, nor is it going to provide a place for paying customers to put their cars while eating and drinking.

> They'll pay for them

Who? The customers would all love to pay for parking, but there wasn't a structure. You're arguing against some point you think I'm making but I'm not.

Re: A Look Inside Apple’s New Campus

#279

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The top comment did not say what you claim they said. Being "no different" is not the same as "still the same in certain respects" I don't think this building is "ridiculously cool." "Out of their way" ? Are you suggesting altruism or generosity?

They don't have cubes. They don't have an open floor plan. Those single person pod/offices are huge productivity benefits that most tech companies simply won't invest in.

"Huge productivity benefits"

Citation needed.

Re: A Look Inside Apple’s New Campus

#280

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where has this successfully been implemented? There's a similar mechanism to what you proposed, resident-only parking permits. This pits the business owners against the residents. It also means that a resident can't have their friends come to visit without risking a ticket. The knee-jerk HN-ism of quick fixes doesn't work here. The only actual solution is the long-term dual-pronged approach: parking structures in the…

Many many cities in Europe. People who live there can park for free, anyone else has to pay a meter. This solves the issues.

1000 people need parking. There are 500 spaces. Paid parking doesn't solve the problem in this instance. The overall effect of paid parking isn't at issue.
Post reply on HN