Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's well known within the medical field that being a doctor is really really tough. It takes a lot of smarts and grueling years in residency before you officially become a doctor. However it also pays incredibly well. Even moreso for specialities and surgeons, who can make over 200k a year even in low cost of living areas. Despite the difficulties of being a doctor it's harder to get into medical school than ever. T…
I'd like to see you maintain your "cry me a river" perspective when the doctor tasked with saving your kids life is burnt out and going through a divorce because of his chosen career. And even if I were to agree with your premises, do we really want a system that selects for the kind of doctors who are willing to put themselves and their loved ones through years of hell in exchange for an eventual high and stable pay…
The Dark Side of Doctoring
181–190 of 241 posts
Re: The Dark Side of Doctoring
#182Earlier quoted context omitted.
We have two family members in an assisted car facility for almost eight years now, and between the two of them, they've tapped Medicare for just under $700K. Together, the sum of both their incomes throughout their entire working lives never totaled that amount. Oh, but it gets worse. It's bad enough that the government is being bilked for hundreds of thousands of dollars on behalf of those without the ability to pay…
House of God is indeed an interesting book and a good read. I read it during second year of my residency, and it is incredibly sad how the stuff that is talked about in the book has gotten worse in some ways, though better in others. I'm actively against the "bowel run" mentality. I do my best to avoid even the CYA test ordering, though I'm not in the ED where this can be the most rife. I see first hand the "ponzi sc…
Re: The Dark Side of Doctoring
#183Earlier quoted context omitted.
Medicare is obviously a big part of healthcare, but is this same pay for performance happening with private insurance? How has the consolidation of hospitals impacted this? Has it become harder to negotiate these deals with massive hosptital networks?
Private insurance actually started a lot of these initiatives. If you're a physician with a busy practice, at the end of the month, you'll get a check from all of the big insurance companies detailing how much they're paying you. It doesn't read, "You saw 100 patients at $100/patient, here's $10,000." It's more like, "You saw 100 patients, here's your per-patient fee of $50. You prescribed 87% generic medicines, whic…
Re: The Dark Side of Doctoring
#184Earlier quoted context omitted.
A better analogy would be ticketing in Jira versus ticketing with Post-It Notes. The main job of the professional (medicine/programming) is not what's at stake here. We're talking about documentation. Jira is a heavyweight ticketing system that is okay, but a lot of people are really slowed down by it, and if there are problems with the network, no-one gets much effective work done. Post-its are less visible to all s…
The Jira analogy falls a little bit flat, because the information entered into an EMR is often the actual product, not just documentation. Orders entered into the EMR directly affect the outcome of the patient, and errors can be fatal. Having a free-text hand-written system for something like that just seems pretty crazy. It'd be like going to a dev shop where no one used linters or wrote tests and the check for depl…
Re: The Dark Side of Doctoring
#185Hard to feel sympathy for millionaires living a life of their choosing.
Re: The Dark Side of Doctoring
#186Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the credentialing in medical practice has more to do with the stakes involved than in some salary-padding or labor-control scheme. Patients want to be able to enter a hospital and have confidence that, when push comes to shove, even the worst MD on call is a better option than a "no-op" treatment. Also, exorbinant salaries and good hours are not to be found in the hospital system. Yes, specialist doctors get…
You are blaming the failings of the US healthcare system on "the market", but the market in health care in the US is not anywhere close to a free market. Some key reasons why not: (1) The supply of doctors (and other health professionals) is restricted by licensing, not driven by the demand for their services. (2) The price of health care is not determined by supply and demand, but by various regulatory arrangements…
(6) basic health care is not a market and pretending it is has been nothing but a moral and economic catastrophe in the US.
Re: The Dark Side of Doctoring
#187So clearly healthcare in the US is fucked end to end. Has anyone (government or private sector) tried or proposed some sort of trial hospital where we just clean-slate redesign and evaluate the whole thing? *Probably would need to be government as would need exceptions from tons of laws.
Read the comments and listen to the debates, and understand that it isn't going to get better until Americans believe that the availability of healthcare shouldn't be solely dependent on income, and that "freedom" around payment and insurance shouldn't be the primary value.
Re: The Dark Side of Doctoring
#188Perhaps the solution to the unreasonable demands placed on Doctors/Surgeons is moving forward with A.I, Stem Cell research, Robotic surgery, etc. Technology should relieve some of the pressure.
Re: The Dark Side of Doctoring
#189Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have a hard time believing that the "free market" can solve healthcare given that the demand for it is more inelastic than pretty much any other product.
The demand for food is also pretty inelastic, yet the free market seems to handle that fine.
Also food is cheap and plentiful to create.
And most importantly, food is easy to steal; the one important factor in a functioning free market libertarians tend to forget about is the natural control at the bottom, for the poor: if the poor need something in order to survive and can't afford it, they act as a check on greed and neoliberalism run amok by ignoring the fake magic pieces of paper that the wealthy wave around as tokens of power and take what they need.
It's a lot harder to steal health care so there's no incentive for the rich to modify the system to help the poor like there is with food.
Re: The Dark Side of Doctoring
#190Earlier quoted context omitted.
The demand for food is also pretty inelastic, yet the free market seems to handle that fine.
No actually it does not. The government subsidizes food production and food for the poor HEAVILY. Also food is cheap and plentiful to create. And most importantly, food is easy to steal; the one important factor in a functioning free market libertarians tend to forget about is the natural control at the bottom, for the poor: if the poor need something in order to survive and can't afford it, they act as a check on gr…