Emacs is sexy
61–70 of 97 posts
Re: Emacs is sexy
#62I'd love to use emacs as my primary editor. But it's too slow compared to sublime.
Re: Emacs is sexy
#63Spacemacs gives you sensible configuration and packages out of the box, whereas the Emacs tutorials I'd begun to read kept repeating, "These are the functions you'll want to use, but only you can decide what to bind them to". That made me lose interest really quick--I'd prefer to have a 95% solution and then adjust it, not reinvent a sensible configuration from nothing. Spacemacs gives you exactly that. If what I'm describing was a barrier for you in adopting Emacs, I'd encourage you to check it out.
Re: Emacs is sexy
#64Re: Emacs is sexy
#65Re: Emacs is sexy
#66Re: Emacs is sexy
#67I'd like to throw in the obligatory https://rms.sexy/
http://donhopkins.com/home/catalog/images/jsol-rms-gerbil-li...
Re: Emacs is sexy
#68Really!?
do you want your 12 yo daughter picking her text editor because it’s “SEXY”!
Re: Emacs is sexy
#69Am I the only one who thinks there should be at least one actual screenshot of emacs on a site titled "emacs is sexy"?
I agree completely. Nothing is sexy about this: http://emacs.sexy/img/How-to-Learn-Emacs-v2-Large.png
So sexy maybe not the right word for this picture but I still love it.
Re: Emacs is sexy
#70Using sexualized language can create an environment that is unduly hostile to women, even if this is not intended. Many of the biases against women that such language provokes are totally unconscious, so even if the intent is not harmful, it can be bad regardless.
More info here: http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/Sexualized_environment
Wording in this comment borrowed from here: https://github.com/alecthomas/voluptuous/issues/287