How Homeownership Became the Engine of American Inequality
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: How Homeownership Became the Engine of American Inequality
#2They bemoan that "the rich" "save" money from the deduction. Isn't it relevant that in order to get a significant discount on taxes, they'd have to be taxed a much larger amount too?
Furthermore, an home-owning couple doesn't realize a single dollar of benefit until after the first $12,600 because of the standard deduction. A renting couple gets all $12,600 for free PLUS they benefit from lower rent because their landlord can deduct not only their own interest and property taxes but other expenses which an occupying homeowner could not (association fees, repairs, etc).
I took NYT's examples and plugged them into the tax calculator to see how much they are paying, including the itemized deductions for the wealthier family:
Asare: $7680 per month plus property taxes (assuming 1.5% in Massachusetts, that's another $831 monthly): https://smartasset.com/taxes/income-taxes#CUgaT4sugl
Diaz: $357 per month: https://smartasset.com/taxes/income-taxes#XkDyAkz2OK [also note the $0 in federal income taxes which the NYT article is focused on, rather than State policy]
Unless one supposes Asare's family is using 20+ times more shared resources than Diaz's, one could come up with a different notion of who the beneficiaries of tax policy may be.
Re: How Homeownership Became the Engine of American Inequality
#3Re: How Homeownership Became the Engine of American Inequality
#4Re: How Homeownership Became the Engine of American Inequality
#5https://hn.algolia.com/?query=How%20Homeownership%20Became%2...
Re: How Homeownership Became the Engine of American Inequality
#6Re: How Homeownership Became the Engine of American Inequality
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nyt has really been spammed here as of late.
I don't mind the abundance of NYT articles as much as submitters not taking the effort to see if an existing discussion has been occurring.
Re: How Homeownership Became the Engine of American Inequality
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't mind the abundance of NYT articles as much as submitters not taking the effort to see if an existing discussion has been occurring.
My apologies. I've taken it for granted that if I submit a duplicate link, I'll be redirected the already-existing HN post. I'll be more careful.
I do wish HN would implement a quick link-checker to help minimise these mistakes.