Live data from Hacker News

Open-source chip RISC-V to take on closed x86, ARM CPUs

computerworld.com.au

21–30 of 157 posts

Re: Open-source chip RISC-V to take on closed x86, ARM CPUs

#21
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Atm, arm is likely a better fit for that.

Right now the arm SBCs actually make functional desktops. There's very little you can't do on a raspberry pi other than run closed software.

Pretty sure that this depends on the definition of 'functional'. My 386DX40 was functional, but I'm glad I have 8 i7 cores now.

Re: Open-source chip RISC-V to take on closed x86, ARM CPUs

#22
Many people claim to want an open-source chip, but end up balking at its price tag, this is exactly why Raptor Engineering's Talos failed. [1]

I've pretty much given up hope on a non-x86 based chip hitting our desktops, the closest to reach will be ARM.

The economies of scale aren't there, I pretty much end up rolling my eyes at each of these articles.

[1] https://www.raptorengineering.com/TALOS/prerelease.php

Re: Open-source chip RISC-V to take on closed x86, ARM CPUs

#23
post #17
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can actually run Windows on a Raspberry Pi. Having said that, they make for horrible machines to do actual work on even with desktop Linux.

Vim and gcc run fine, I can compiler kernels and busybox and work on my personal software projects and homework on mine. They don't run gnome or html5 browsers as well as your laptop might but nothing runs those well anyway.

t-try installing Chrome on it...

Re: Open-source chip RISC-V to take on closed x86, ARM CPUs

#24
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Vim and gcc run fine, I can compiler kernels and busybox and work on my personal software projects and homework on mine. They don't run gnome or html5 browsers as well as your laptop might but nothing runs those well anyway.

t-try installing Chrome on it...

lynx for life yo!

Re: Open-source chip RISC-V to take on closed x86, ARM CPUs

#25

Many people claim to want an open-source chip, but end up balking at its price tag, this is exactly why Raptor Engineering's Talos failed. [1] I've pretty much given up hope on a non-x86 based chip hitting our desktops, the closest to reach will be ARM. The economies of scale aren't there, I pretty much end up rolling my eyes at each of these articles. [1] https://www.raptorengineering.com/TALOS/prerelease.php

The hole point of a free ISA is that many different people can produce them so that it will reach a economy of scale and chip producers will face competition making dirving down price.

Its not garantied to work but its a worty target.

Re: Open-source chip RISC-V to take on closed x86, ARM CPUs

#26

Many people claim to want an open-source chip, but end up balking at its price tag, this is exactly why Raptor Engineering's Talos failed. [1] I've pretty much given up hope on a non-x86 based chip hitting our desktops, the closest to reach will be ARM. The economies of scale aren't there, I pretty much end up rolling my eyes at each of these articles. [1] https://www.raptorengineering.com/TALOS/prerelease.php

[deleted]

Re: Open-source chip RISC-V to take on closed x86, ARM CPUs

#27
post #25

Many people claim to want an open-source chip, but end up balking at its price tag, this is exactly why Raptor Engineering's Talos failed. [1] I've pretty much given up hope on a non-x86 based chip hitting our desktops, the closest to reach will be ARM. The economies of scale aren't there, I pretty much end up rolling my eyes at each of these articles. [1] https://www.raptorengineering.com/TALOS/prerelease.php

The hole point of a free ISA is that many different people can produce them so that it will reach a economy of scale and chip producers will face competition making dirving down price. Its not garantied to work but its a worty target.

Free is about freedom, not price.

Re: Open-source chip RISC-V to take on closed x86, ARM CPUs

#30
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The hole point of a free ISA is that many different people can produce them so that it will reach a economy of scale and chip producers will face competition making dirving down price. Its not garantied to work but its a worty target.

Free is about freedom, not price.

So, freedom is only for the rich?
Post reply on HN