Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
1–10 of 22 posts
Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
#2Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
#3Buzz is something I once turned on and is too lazy to turn off. It brings me nothing of value.
But that's obviously just me. Others might differ.
Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
#4I don't see how. Buzz is something I once turned on and is too lazy to turn off. It brings me nothing of value. But that's obviously just me. Others might differ.
Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
#5Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
#6Activity Streams, PubSubHubbub, Salmon protocol on the roadmap
Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
#7"I know, I have 10,000 people following me..."
Was there anything intelligent in this article, or more ego masturbation?
Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
#8No way, not in the vanilla organic results. You hear these speculations with every new Google service (e.g., Knol), and they're always unfounded. IMHO, Google would be asking for an antitrust case if they started playing that game.
However, Buzz results do show up in One Box results, and are prominently featured in the real-time listings, so they are more valuable than one might expect. Also, last time I checked they don't nofollow the links in Buzz posts. ;)
So generally, I think Robert is right that there's an "SEO opportunity" with Buzz, but probably not for the reason he thinks.
Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
#9Re: Is it time to reconsider Google Buzz vs Facebook or Twitter?
#10What I've found interesting is that part of what seems to be making Buzz more engaging is how it is tied to your real name (assuming that is what you use for Gmail) - but at the same time that has been part of what has made me hesitant to fully adopting it.