Earlier quoted context omitted.
I lack the expertise to comment on the sensitivity of the cellulose specifically, but the metro stations where I live will perform random stops as you enter, and the monitors are in plain sight. Notebooks, stacks of paper, and note cards are usually pretty clearly detected by whatever software they're using to help highlight items. It seems weird to me that there could be such difficulty with TSA scanners versus the…
>Notebooks, stacks of paper, and note cards are usually pretty clearly detected by whatever software they're using to help highlight items How do you know the problem isn't that the software flags dangerous items as paper incorrectly (which I think is the mostly likely problem here)? I doubt you've seen the X-ray image of someone smuggling nitrocellulose. The software is just using density--if you have an explosive o…
Every time I've seen it on the scanners here, or the glimpses I've seen at airports last I was in the US, usually it's very clear what you're looking at - books and other paper products are plain to see.
If they obfuscate, sure, possibly. But just from personal experience it doesn't seem like it would be indistinguishable.
I'm not saying that these tools are infallible by any means, just that the particular claim didn't mesh with my experience.