No one else has brought this up, but her "fidget spinner" is a totally different device than the ones that are popular. It's like a frisbee with a bump in the middle to center it on your finger, which I assume lets you get it moving it one handed by "hula hooping" it around. But you can't put it in your pocket and carry it everywhere, nor can you fidget inconspicuously. The popular fidget spinners are small, flat dev…
The photo in the article shows this.
Fidget spinner craze inventor struggles to make ends meet
21–30 of 32 posts
Re: Fidget spinner craze inventor struggles to make ends meet
#22Re: Fidget spinner craze inventor struggles to make ends meet
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
The photo in the article shows this.
Thanks for pointing this out. I didn't even notice that weird frisbee looking thing on first read. Those are not, or at least should not, be covered by the same patent.
The "As fidget spinner craze goes global, its inventor struggles to make ends meet" headline is 100% bullshit and the rest of the article isn't any better.
Re: Fidget spinner craze inventor struggles to make ends meet
#24I think this illustrates one of the catch-22's of patents. If you hold the patent, other companies does not have incentive to make and market the invention, making it harder to create market awareness. But if you let go of the patent, unless you have the resources to compete, you're unlikely to benefit from your invention. You do have an early mover advantage, but if you don't have the means to invest, it doesn't hel…
Potentially a bigger problem than any you cite is discoverability. So she has a patent... so what? No company out there is going to search over the patents looking for a good idea. If they manage to come up with an independent implementation of something that happens to hit the patent, and they happen to do a search, they're far more likely to modify the idea until it doesn't hit the patent than to go try to license it from an individual.
There really isn't any fixing the problem that there's no path that looks like "1. Have idea. 2. Patent idea. 3. Profit." Step three is going to have to look like a business. Even if you assume basic income and even if you somehow remove money from the situation entirely, which is to put it least incredibly idealistic, if you want to see "success" you're still going to have to hustle and build awareness. (And, apparently, do this on the same basic income as everybody else in that ideal world, which won't exactly make it easier to stand out.) Perfectly feasible with the right use of social media, but on average it won't happen just by putting up a post of your idea and waiting for the plaudits to roll in.
Re: Fidget spinner craze inventor struggles to make ends meet
#25> Hettinger held the patent on finger spinners for eight years, but surrendered it in 2005 because she could not afford the $400 (£310) renewal fee. Isn't this bizarre? If she couldn't monetize it and make it profitable in eight years, maybe it's for the best that someone else gets a shot. We should not fall into the trap of thinking that intellectual property is like other forms of property. It's a trade where the p…
You're absolutely right but it still sucks. She has a great attitude about it but if i am honest and this kind of thing happened to me i would be seriously pissed, at myself more then anyone else.
Re: Fidget spinner craze inventor struggles to make ends meet
#26Re: Fidget spinner craze inventor struggles to make ends meet
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks for pointing this out. I didn't even notice that weird frisbee looking thing on first read. Those are not, or at least should not, be covered by the same patent.
I didn't realize it either until I found my way to the kickstarter page. It's the size of your head! And you can twirl a normal frisbee's rim around your finger just fine! And frisbees come in multiple more manageable sizes. And you can pack a frisbee into a bag more easily because it's flat. I don't mean to be a dick, but I can see why Hasbro chose not to produce it. It's a frisbee with a big lump on it that probabl…
https://medium.com/@jobosapien/real-vs-fake-the-infamous-cas...
Re: Fidget spinner craze inventor struggles to make ends meet
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks for pointing this out. I didn't even notice that weird frisbee looking thing on first read. Those are not, or at least should not, be covered by the same patent.
I didn't realize it either until I found my way to the kickstarter page. It's the size of your head! And you can twirl a normal frisbee's rim around your finger just fine! And frisbees come in multiple more manageable sizes. And you can pack a frisbee into a bag more easily because it's flat. I don't mean to be a dick, but I can see why Hasbro chose not to produce it. It's a frisbee with a big lump on it that probabl…
"The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce."
Thanks but no thanks, Guardian.
Re: Fidget spinner craze inventor struggles to make ends meet
#29Those things are a cool thing but I am glad once this craze ends and not every second item on thingiverse is another spinner.
Re: Fidget spinner craze inventor struggles to make ends meet
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're absolutely right but it still sucks. She has a great attitude about it but if i am honest and this kind of thing happened to me i would be seriously pissed, at myself more then anyone else.
Except that her device is completely different than the spinners of today. The child in the photo is holding one in her right hand.