Live data from Hacker News

Coinbase adds support for Litecoin

techcrunch.com

51–60 of 257 posts

Re: Coinbase adds support for Litecoin

#51

Segregated witness should activate in litecoin in about ~6 days. http://litecoinblockhalf.com/segwit.php

What is this?

It's a feature originally developed for Bitcoin:

https://bitcoincore.org/en/2016/01/26/segwit-benefits/

Litecoin is based on Bitcoin Core's codebase and therefore inherited it as well. Due to various reasons it's activating on Litecoin before Bitcoin.

Re: Coinbase adds support for Litecoin

#53
post #23

Is there interest in a cryptocurrency index fund? The idea is you could just buy an index fund composed of, say, 50% BTC, 20% ETH, 15% LTC and 15% ZEC. I'm fairly certain that one of these cryptocurrencies will 10 or 100x in value over the next 5 years, but buying each one individually is just such a pain. Would you invest? In reality, we'd probably buy the top 10 coins weighted according to some measure, and rebalan…

> fund composed of, say, 50% BTC, 20% ETH, 15% LTC and 15% ZEC

> ... buy the top 10 coins weighted according to some measure, and rebalance once a week

As a relatively sophisticated investor myself, I'm not against the idea, but whether or not I'd invest in it would depend heavily on the implementation. And as of now with that example portfolio, I definitely wouldn't invest in it. Having a large btc bias when all the major cryptos are already highly correlated with btc seems redundant, and rebalancing once a week seems like overkill. Also, marketcap is a poor indicator of returns, in case you're considering using it for weighting.

Re: Coinbase adds support for Litecoin

#54
post #36
post #23

Is there interest in a cryptocurrency index fund? The idea is you could just buy an index fund composed of, say, 50% BTC, 20% ETH, 15% LTC and 15% ZEC. I'm fairly certain that one of these cryptocurrencies will 10 or 100x in value over the next 5 years, but buying each one individually is just such a pain. Would you invest? In reality, we'd probably buy the top 10 coins weighted according to some measure, and rebalan…

This is a bad idea. When you're buying a cryptocurrency, you're purchasing trust. Leaving your cryptocurrency with a third party undermines this. Any business idea based on people leaving cryptocurrency with a third party is doomed. Instead, why not tackle the reasons why buying those cryptocurrencies are difficult?

Coinbase doesn't seem all that doomed to me.

Neither does Polychain Capital, the cryptoasset hedge fund backed by Andreesen Horowitz and Union Square Ventures.

Re: Coinbase adds support for Litecoin

#55
post #23

Is there interest in a cryptocurrency index fund? The idea is you could just buy an index fund composed of, say, 50% BTC, 20% ETH, 15% LTC and 15% ZEC. I'm fairly certain that one of these cryptocurrencies will 10 or 100x in value over the next 5 years, but buying each one individually is just such a pain. Would you invest? In reality, we'd probably buy the top 10 coins weighted according to some measure, and rebalan…

> fund composed of, say, 50% BTC, 20% ETH, 15% LTC and 15% ZEC > ... buy the top 10 coins weighted according to some measure, and rebalance once a week As a relatively sophisticated investor myself, I'm not against the idea, but whether or not I'd invest in it would depend heavily on the implementation. And as of now with that example portfolio, I definitely wouldn't invest in it. Having a large btc bias when all the…

I assumed those percentages were just totally made up to demonstrate the idea, not a concrete proposal.

Re: Coinbase adds support for Litecoin

#56
post #50
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you are buying to speculate perhaps your concern is not the features of the currency but rather the profit potential. You might be perfectly content trusting a third party.

This could not be further from the truth. If anybody else has the private keys to your coins, you don't own the coins. People have been burned by a countless number brokers. They will not leave their coins with a company such as this. Only the most unsophisticated investors leave their coins with brokers. Anybody knowledgeable enough to invest in multiple cryptocurrencies is smart enough to know they need complete co…

Does your argument still apply if you change "coins" to "cash" and "brokers" to "banks"?

I leave my fiat money in banks because I judge that the risk of the bank disappearing and taking my money with it is lower than the risk of my house getting burgled, catching fire, etc. Likewise, it's entirely reasonable to think that a competent Bitcoin broker is more secure and safe than my half-assed attempt to keep my own keys and risk losing access to my coins through my own incompetence.

Re: Coinbase adds support for Litecoin

#57
post #50
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you are buying to speculate perhaps your concern is not the features of the currency but rather the profit potential. You might be perfectly content trusting a third party.

This could not be further from the truth. If anybody else has the private keys to your coins, you don't own the coins. People have been burned by a countless number brokers. They will not leave their coins with a company such as this. Only the most unsophisticated investors leave their coins with brokers. Anybody knowledgeable enough to invest in multiple cryptocurrencies is smart enough to know they need complete co…

Most of the people who by gold don't seem to be concerned also by the fact that they just hold paper not the real thing. If this business model works for gold it should be viable for btc also.

I am not talking about if it is a good idea to hold paper gold or btc, just if people would by paper btc.

Re: Coinbase adds support for Litecoin

#58
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> fund composed of, say, 50% BTC, 20% ETH, 15% LTC and 15% ZEC > ... buy the top 10 coins weighted according to some measure, and rebalance once a week As a relatively sophisticated investor myself, I'm not against the idea, but whether or not I'd invest in it would depend heavily on the implementation. And as of now with that example portfolio, I definitely wouldn't invest in it. Having a large btc bias when all the…

I assumed those percentages were just totally made up to demonstrate the idea, not a concrete proposal.

No yeah, I get that. My critique was meant as an example of why implementation matters so much in a product like this. Because without even a rough estimate of how the index would be composed, it's hard to give any kind of feedback really.

EDIT: also, the btc bias comment was meant to generalize beyond just that example portfolio, because as a potential 'customer', I felt it should be made clear that btc is what I hold when I want liquidity, therefore it seems redundant to allocate any significant portion of my investment portfolio into an asset that I'm already going to be maintaining for everyday use and casual savings anyway.

Re: Coinbase adds support for Litecoin

#59

Segregated witness should activate in litecoin in about ~6 days. http://litecoinblockhalf.com/segwit.php

What is this?

A somewhat controversial protocol upgrade developed for bitcoin. On the bitcoin network it has not reached the necessary support yet. Most bitcoiners view its activation on litecoin as a large scale beta test.
Post reply on HN