I don't get it. Much of the USA is faced with crumbling infrastructure and a lack of money for maintaining that infrastructure. How is creating a network of powered tunnels - which are much more expensive to maintain than surface roads - going to interact with this economic reality? This seems like technology that addresses mostly fun, theoretical problems - like traffic optimization, not ugly, practical ones like ti…
The Boring Company [video]
101–110 of 800 posts
Re: The Boring Company [video]
#102Also, what is the point of those rails? Seems like self-driving cars would be much easier and require a lot less.
I think the robotic conveyer belt style design like seen in movies like iRobot would be cheaper and more convenient. Plus, having it so people don't walk to their cars means you don't have to worry about theft in parking garages as much either.
Re: The Boring Company [video]
#103Did anyone else notice that cars being lowered leaves a giant fucking hole in the middle of the street?! This is a marketing fluff video untouched by engineers
Re: The Boring Company [video]
#104Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or how about moving trains on rails? I am of two minds about self driving cars. From a technology point of view, I think its great, but I don't really see what problem they solve that would not be better solved by ubiquitous public transportation (trains, mostly). Now, Musk wants to carry cars on sleds through tunnels under LA? Why not just build some damn trains? EDIT: the real news is that he wants to improve borin…
It's about the last mile connectivity. People don't want to walk/uber from home to the train station and from the train station to work. Having a car on rails solves this problem.
Compare that to Seattle, where my friend got lost trying to get from the light rail to the incredibly slow train up to Vancouver because they're several blocks apart. And then had to do the same on the Vancouver end for the same reason. To make matters worse, the train between the two cities is actually slower than the train between Tokyo and Hiroshima, with roughly 3x the distance.
Re: The Boring Company [video]
#105Re: The Boring Company [video]
#106This is the dumbest thing I've seen him produce. Reliable rapid public transit is better in dozens of ways.
... except in the crucial way of "getting people to buy more Teslas", which is the metric Musk is most concerned about.
Re: The Boring Company [video]
#107When I heard about Boring Company I kind of just assumed it would be used for underground hyper loops. This feels kind of wrong.
Hyperloop at least has the right idea: Building above-ground is vastly less expensive than tunnelling.
Hyperloops are round + tunnels are round = Boring Company
Putting cars through the tunnels is not what I first expected.
Re: The Boring Company [video]
#108Re: The Boring Company [video]
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
And concrete production? And underground hazard detection? And coordination with city infrastructure? And...
Honestly though these same sentences came up around Teslas too. And battery production? And crash test safety? And coordination with NHTSA?
He's cut component costs on the Tesla by maybe 70%. On the SpaceX project it's more like 80% compared to the highest cost competitor. Both of these are huge achievements.
The problem with tunnels is they're not cars, not rockets, not anything like he's ever done before. If he had a functioning Hyperloop system, if he'd proven he can build out infrastructure on a geographic scale and not just product from a factory I'd be more likely to agree with you.
This is a bad idea, a bad project, and a total waste of time.
Re: The Boring Company [video]
#110http://articles.latimes.com/2013/apr/25/local/la-me-ln-elon-...