Live data from Hacker News

How ebooks lost their shine

theguardian.com

51–59 of 59 posts

Re: How ebooks lost their shine

#51
post #37

I prefer PDF files rather than ebook formats. I don't like the idea of being locked into a particular technology, be it Apple's or Amazon's. I consider PDF viewers to be superior to the experience offered by ebook viewers. For example, Having to tap the left and right side of the screen to move between pages is a pain compared to swiping up or down in a fluid motion. Another issue is the waste of space by trying to s…

> no matter where I might be Well, with a few exceptions, such as an airplane and some other places (on a trail, deep in the woods) where you may not have an internet connection.

If that will be the case I take a USB stick or preload my device with what I'll need

Re: How ebooks lost their shine

#52
Things you can't do with a book (though I still love them): tap words to get a definition; carry thousands in your back pocket; highlight text non-destructively; write notes non-destructively; change the font size; read in the dark; know how long until you finish the chapter/book ....

Re: How ebooks lost their shine

#53
post #36

It is the multitude of form factors on the internet that keeps absorbing and reducing the total value of books. For what subject is a 300-page collection of "pages" still the best form factor? How can it compete, for example, with a StackOverflow page, when answering technical questions? Maybe a book is still useful for fiction, but how long will it take before people design better form factors even for novels?

Indeed. Being stuck with the fixed page format is like being stuck in the "horseless-carriage" mentality. A4 or whatever paper sheet format should be completely abandoned in favor of dynamic text formatting - not unlike what browsers can do when displaying HTML.

That only applies to PDF.

Most e-books are in epub or mobi format, and those are essentially HTML.

Re: How ebooks lost their shine

#54

I prefer PDF files rather than ebook formats. I don't like the idea of being locked into a particular technology, be it Apple's or Amazon's. I consider PDF viewers to be superior to the experience offered by ebook viewers. For example, Having to tap the left and right side of the screen to move between pages is a pain compared to swiping up or down in a fluid motion. Another issue is the waste of space by trying to s…

I hate PDFs basically for the same reasons you seem to like them.

It's far easier to configure FBReader to have small margins, nice colors and use gestures to flip a page, than to deal with the fixed page format issues of PDFs.

Re: How ebooks lost their shine

#55

It is the multitude of form factors on the internet that keeps absorbing and reducing the total value of books. For what subject is a 300-page collection of "pages" still the best form factor? How can it compete, for example, with a StackOverflow page, when answering technical questions? Maybe a book is still useful for fiction, but how long will it take before people design better form factors even for novels?

Actually, dynamically flowing text works great for novels. It's a lot worse for most technical content though, where diagrams, tables, etc. designed with both readability factors and the specific target page size in mind remain important.

Which is why novels are popular in the HTML-based e-reader formats, technical content less so.

Re: How ebooks lost their shine

#56

I prefer PDF files rather than ebook formats. I don't like the idea of being locked into a particular technology, be it Apple's or Amazon's. I consider PDF viewers to be superior to the experience offered by ebook viewers. For example, Having to tap the left and right side of the screen to move between pages is a pain compared to swiping up or down in a fluid motion. Another issue is the waste of space by trying to s…

> I consider PDF viewers to be superior to the experience offered by ebook viewers. For example, Having to tap the left and right side of the screen to move between pages is a pain compared to swiping up or down in a fluid motion.

> […] On the same device PDF viewer will zoom text to use the entire screen with a double tap of a paragraph.

I believe there are shortcomings of the ebook viewing software, not the ebook format.

Re: How ebooks lost their shine

#57
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have no idea what you're asking me. Is this wit? Are you implying everyone dog-ears books? Were you ruffled by my hyperbole?

I think you're getting ribbed a bit.

Oh I'm sure I am :)

It just seems like a total non sequitur from what I had said. Trying to figure out what they meant. Sadly, we'll probably never know.

Re: How ebooks lost their shine

#58
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you're getting ribbed a bit.

Oh I'm sure I am :) It just seems like a total non sequitur from what I had said. Trying to figure out what they meant. Sadly, we'll probably never know.

Sorry, I always take books into the bath and the bottom bit gets soggy. Which seems far worse than just dog earring the pages.

Between that and the dogs my house is where books go to die.

Re: How ebooks lost their shine

#59

"While ebooks, which are not things of beauty, have become more expensive; a new digital fiction release is often only a pound or two cheaper than a hardback." I'm betting has more to do with it than romantic notions of people preferring physical books. Given the choice of a fiction book for $10 in hardcopy or $9 as an ebook, I'll take the hardcopy. If ebooks (and movie downloads come to that) were priced the same as…

>I'm betting has more to do with it than...

I think you accidentally a word.

Post reply on HN