Live data from Hacker News

DJI Puts $145K Bounty on the Drone Pilots Who Were Disrupting Flights

improdrone.com

51–60 of 102 posts

Re: DJI Puts $145K Bounty on the Drone Pilots Who Were Disrupting Flights

#51

Unfortunately there are thousands of assholes that don't know or even don't care where they fly those things Same with lasers, same with hot air balloons Maybe after some of them are jailed or fined they'll start to behave

Same with cars, but they kill over a million people a year. Somehow that is acceptable though.

Re: DJI Puts $145K Bounty on the Drone Pilots Who Were Disrupting Flights

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I live and often walk past a place with an amazing view of some world-renowned scenery. Almost every time I walk past now, I have to hear the annoying buzz of drones filming today's happy bride and groom. I used to think drones were cool and wanted one, but now I just find them a bit irritating. I do like the footage they can take though.

People will always be annoyed at thing occupying space they're trying to enjoy. Some say the same about tourists in general (eg yourself), and houses, and cars, and wind turbines. I even know someone who doesn't like trees - they clutter up the beautiful hillsides.

While i agree with the sentiment, I'd argue that the power a single drone has to dominate the space for everyone else present makes it a slightly different case; wind turbines, tourists and roads provide benefit to many at the resentment of few.

Drone flying in public spaces is an intrisicly selfish act - more like playing music without headphones on the bus or letting your dog foul in public

Re: DJI Puts $145K Bounty on the Drone Pilots Who Were Disrupting Flights

#53

> Let’s not forget that DJI has software which limits the abilities of the drones based on the pilot’s location. For example, DJI has established that airports are no-fly zones. However, there are some ways that drone pilots can bypass this measure and fly without restriction from DJI. DJI is going really far on this. They already have pre-installed software which restricts drones in no-fly zones. Even more, they are…

Signal-jacking and gps spoofing is the only cost-efficient and scalable way to bring these things down. The word gun really mangles the reality of counter-drone solutions

This machine disables drones.

http://images.sscentral.org/reviews/cps2000_00.jpg

Re: DJI Puts $145K Bounty on the Drone Pilots Who Were Disrupting Flights

#54

Unfortunately there are thousands of assholes that don't know or even don't care where they fly those things Same with lasers, same with hot air balloons Maybe after some of them are jailed or fined they'll start to behave

Same with cars, but they kill over a million people a year. Somehow that is acceptable though.

Your example is only valid when considering driving a car down an airport runway.

Deaths from motor vehicles != unauthroised drone flights outside airports

Re: DJI Puts $145K Bounty on the Drone Pilots Who Were Disrupting Flights

#55
DJI actually has some systems in place to prevent illegal flights. By default it only goes as high as the law permits and can't enter no-fly zones (as if there were a force field). Even in smaller airports, the app will alert you to fly with caution (for example, in class C airspace) You can override these limits, but, as far as I know, the event is somehow logged.

Re: DJI Puts $145K Bounty on the Drone Pilots Who Were Disrupting Flights

#56
post #32

I'm so glad DJI is doing this. I've started flying drones in September of 2016. I use to be annoyed by them, but now as a pilot and a photographer, really love the unique perspectives drone footage gives me. That said, I hear from many people who dislike drones (I can understand them since I was one, too) and all it takes is one or two people to ruin it for everyone else. So it's really good DJI is taking the lead on…

Would you mind talking about your experience so far? I'm a photographer myself and I've always thought about getting a drone myself. What drone are you currently using? I was thinking about getting a Mavic Pro so I can carry it easily in my motorcycle, but it's a little bit expensive.

I have the Mavic and I am pretty happy with it myself. It's not perfect, but it's generally the best drone I have used (the range is the best you can get, camera is pretty good, portability is great, battery life great). The only drone better is the Phantom 4 Pro, which is $1500 if I am not mistaken. Is it worth the price? Depends on what you are using it for. Also, if you do buy it, make another DJI account, generate an affiliate code, and use it to buy the Mavic via their website. That way you can use the $50 credit to buy yourself a second battery. Also keep in mind that if you want to use it professionally and are in the US, that you need to get the Part 107 licensing by law.

Re: DJI Puts $145K Bounty on the Drone Pilots Who Were Disrupting Flights

#57
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is already happening in Iraq and Syria. Daesh have been using them for quite some time now, with home made bombs made from rifle grenades. Here's one such example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_mFARET5aU This is exactly why a lot of police forces and militaries are developing anti-drone tactics, including anti-drone eagles ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiinhvBCXE8 ), RF based 'guns', and drones with big…

Pretty sure that a drone carrying a chunk of metal or stone, and crashing itself into one of the jet intakes of a plane that is taking off is a great way to instill terror into airline passengers. Most drone pilots would have no problem placing them in the path of the jet intake at the last second. Replace the slab of concrete with a grenade, for added fear.

All modern ( post-1950) commercial airliners are certificated to continue take-off with one engine failing completely.

Many passengers wouldn't even realise other than a reduction of noise.

Furthermore the engine casings are designed to retain thrown blades. A grenade is fairly low-energy in comparison.

Re: DJI Puts $145K Bounty on the Drone Pilots Who Were Disrupting Flights

#58
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know - the idea of someone who has done a week's "security training" running around all that expensive, critical ground and airborne communications & navigation equipment with a weapon capable of blasting out EMP signals makes me more than a little nervous... No matter how expensive the "gun" is, you cannot really direct an EMP wave and restrict it like a traditional borescope weapon. All it will take is for…

from what I've heard, the 'guns' are just signal jammers

The problem being that in order to effectively 'jam' a signal far away, antenna theory requires that a fairly significant proportion of that radio energy must be directed out the back of the 'antenna'/gun. Right into the person firing it.

That's also ignoring the fact that if the signal to a drone is lost, it's more than likely to fall out of the sky like a ton of bricks.

Re: DJI Puts $145K Bounty on the Drone Pilots Who Were Disrupting Flights

#59

I'm so glad DJI is doing this. I've started flying drones in September of 2016. I use to be annoyed by them, but now as a pilot and a photographer, really love the unique perspectives drone footage gives me. That said, I hear from many people who dislike drones (I can understand them since I was one, too) and all it takes is one or two people to ruin it for everyone else. So it's really good DJI is taking the lead on…

I live and often walk past a place with an amazing view of some world-renowned scenery. Almost every time I walk past now, I have to hear the annoying buzz of drones filming today's happy bride and groom. I used to think drones were cool and wanted one, but now I just find them a bit irritating. I do like the footage they can take though.

I can understand the sentiment. I'm a frequent drone flyer and I try my best to quickly get it to an altitude where it's not all that loud or noticeable when I'm around other people. When it's 200-300ft up, it's barely audible.

Re: DJI Puts $145K Bounty on the Drone Pilots Who Were Disrupting Flights

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I live and often walk past a place with an amazing view of some world-renowned scenery. Almost every time I walk past now, I have to hear the annoying buzz of drones filming today's happy bride and groom. I used to think drones were cool and wanted one, but now I just find them a bit irritating. I do like the footage they can take though.

People will always be annoyed at thing occupying space they're trying to enjoy. Some say the same about tourists in general (eg yourself), and houses, and cars, and wind turbines. I even know someone who doesn't like trees - they clutter up the beautiful hillsides.

It's the noise drones make: they're incredibly loud.
Post reply on HN