Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Kobble – Notes app that saves directly to GitHub

kobble.io

31–40 of 163 posts

Re: Show HN: Kobble – Notes app that saves directly to GitHub

#31
post #6

> Kobble is the only app available where you own all of your data. What? I find that highly unlikely. In what way do I not "own" the texts I write in–for example–Apple's Notes.app? And what is even meant by "own"? Even for something like Facebook, I'm pretty sure that I still own the copyright for texts I write in their app.

Yeah, that's not correct, with my application Noterium you also "own" your notes, that is they are stored on your computer.

Re: Show HN: Kobble – Notes app that saves directly to GitHub

#32
post #27
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The model is very similar to other popular apps, like YouTube or Spotify. Instead of organizing songs or videos into channels, you organize tracks.

But these terms make some amount of intuitive sense on YouTube or Spotify. I don't have to know anything about YouTube or Spotify other than they deal with video clips and music to have a decent idea what a 'track', 'video', 'channel', 'playlist' might mean. These terms don't translate that well to 'notes', though.

Kobble can be used for much more than just notes. You organize 'tracks', which are more like projects. Tracks can contain notes, but also more meaningful content. Anything you can create with markdown (plus links, etc.)

Re: Show HN: Kobble – Notes app that saves directly to GitHub

#34
I registered localnotes.io or something a couple of years ago to make a notes app (just a side list of note files and then a markdown editor) that would persist to local storage and could be synced to private gists and images would store as base64 encoded files under that gist.

I got a proof of concept working but was too lazy to integrate with GitHub and canned it.

Working on something more fun now and learning vue.js.

Re: Show HN: Kobble – Notes app that saves directly to GitHub

#35
post #6

> Kobble is the only app available where you own all of your data. What? I find that highly unlikely. In what way do I not "own" the texts I write in–for example–Apple's Notes.app? And what is even meant by "own"? Even for something like Facebook, I'm pretty sure that I still own the copyright for texts I write in their app.

By 'own', we mean that no data is stored on our servers. The goal is privacy and to protect your data.

Re: Show HN: Kobble – Notes app that saves directly to GitHub

#36
post #11

Shameless plug time again... * My summer project (2016): http://public.docs.xstatic.site * The pitch goes something like this: | Docs is a simple, fast and easy to use, web based document editor. It generates static (but editable) HTML files that can than be easily shared and printed. Like Google Docs inside an AWS S3 bucket. * More info in this document: http://docs.xstatic.site/markdown_db86ac26-f232-4400-a544-d5..…

I think a Show HN is the one time it's bad form to shamelessly plug your own product.

Re: Show HN: Kobble – Notes app that saves directly to GitHub

#37
post #20
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Normally I'd expect something like "it is stored under your control" for the slogan "own your data", but that doesn't square with "saves directly to GitHub"

Exactly. I see very little difference whether my notes are stored in a github repo or a google drive folder. In either case they are under "my" account but I don't think I would say that I really "own" the data because either service could hypothetically be gone tomorrow.

That's precisely why we use GitHub. It's unlikely to be gone tomorrow. No data is stored on our servers. In fact, we don't even see it. The data is transferred directly from your browser to GitHub.

Re: Show HN: Kobble – Notes app that saves directly to GitHub

#39
post #32
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But these terms make some amount of intuitive sense on YouTube or Spotify. I don't have to know anything about YouTube or Spotify other than they deal with video clips and music to have a decent idea what a 'track', 'video', 'channel', 'playlist' might mean. These terms don't translate that well to 'notes', though.

Kobble can be used for much more than just notes. You organize 'tracks', which are more like projects. Tracks can contain notes, but also more meaningful content. Anything you can create with markdown (plus links, etc.)

If they are just like projects, then call them projects. You're using music and video names for paper analog components. You're spending a lot of time defending the naming here. I'd recommend taking notes, and changing the naming. Also, add some mechanism where I can just hit a + button or something, and can start adding a note right away. I don't want to have to immediately organize all notes into a draconian structure. I just need to quickly record something for later use. I feel that should be a primary function of a notes app. Pretty is secondary to function, and the functionality of this is complex and obscure.

Re: Show HN: Kobble – Notes app that saves directly to GitHub

#40
post #35
post #6

> Kobble is the only app available where you own all of your data. What? I find that highly unlikely. In what way do I not "own" the texts I write in–for example–Apple's Notes.app? And what is even meant by "own"? Even for something like Facebook, I'm pretty sure that I still own the copyright for texts I write in their app.

By 'own', we mean that no data is stored on our servers. The goal is privacy and to protect your data.

We don't own Githubs servers any more than we own Apples. This statement is a falsehood.
Post reply on HN