Botantical classification is interesting but difficult. Once trained, it's fast enough, but can "deep learning" be anywhere near accurate enough? I'd guess there'd be a focus on salient botantical features for classification, and perhaps the human can be enlisted to circle them out. There could be a "twenty questions"-type narrowing down, perhaps using images.
I wonder too how much geolocation could pare things down, provided it's not invasive/introduced species.
Identify Plants with an App
41–50 of 117 posts
Re: Identify Plants with an App
#42Re: Identify Plants with an App
#43This product already exists. It's called Google Image Search. For instance, I was actually able to identify the second flower he takes a picture of in the video as Camellia Japonica simply from a screenshot of the video. I'd be blown away if they were able to assemble a better training set than Google. Kind of disappointing, as from the headline I was expecting something based on NIR spectroscopy, like the SciO molec…
Re: Identify Plants with an App
#44This product already exists. It's called Google Image Search. For instance, I was actually able to identify the second flower he takes a picture of in the video as Camellia Japonica simply from a screenshot of the video. I'd be blown away if they were able to assemble a better training set than Google. Kind of disappointing, as from the headline I was expecting something based on NIR spectroscopy, like the SciO molec…
In fact. There is a better product, Google Goggles - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.and...
In this respect, as the GP says, image search is currently the best option
Re: Identify Plants with an App
#45I really want this app. That is all.
would you pay for it? I also kinda want it, as I get curious when I'm out on a hike, but I'm not sure I'd pay for it.
Re: Identify Plants with an App
#46I want do the same for mushroom, because they are hard to recognize. Google images works quite fine.
I did it, but the results can be pretty disappointing, I'm still working on improving them: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.pingou.cha... https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/champignouf/id1227854971 ps: any improvement suggestion is welcome!
Google Image is really working quite good. I made a lot of test. The only problem is about there's TOS. I can easily write something but I don't want to be flagged because I don't want use there API.
Re: Identify Plants with an App
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Visual identification of mushrooms can be deadly. Always do a proper spore print and have it analyzed by a mycologist.
wut? I know it can be deadly but it's your responsibility to eat it or not. I think about tell information, like you want for other type of plant too, you want know if it's the right time to cut it, etc. nothing about eating or not. I don't need really an apps for finding some morels.
Re: Identify Plants with an App
#48I use this android app for recognizing plants by picture: http://identify.plantnet-project.org/ It's made by french researchers I think. It doesn't work perfectly but I did identify a lot of plants I don't know with it. You can snap multiple pictures of the same plant, for example, 2 pictures of the leaves, 1 of a flower and 1 of the bark, and then use the combination to search. You can also submit your observations…
It doesn't work very well in Singapore at all. I guess the training set didn't include much from this part of the world.
Pl@ntNet only works for the plants of the French metropolitan flora.Re: Identify Plants with an App
#49This product already exists. It's called Google Image Search. For instance, I was actually able to identify the second flower he takes a picture of in the video as Camellia Japonica simply from a screenshot of the video. I'd be blown away if they were able to assemble a better training set than Google. Kind of disappointing, as from the headline I was expecting something based on NIR spectroscopy, like the SciO molec…
In fact. There is a better product, Google Goggles - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.and...
Updated
May 28, 2014
Kinda dead...