Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Should I trademark prior to Y Combinator?

news.ycombinator.com

31–40 of 42 posts

Re: Ask HN: Should I trademark prior to Y Combinator?

#31
IANAL. My understanding is that by using your name in commerce (in particular interstate commerce) you already have an automatic trademark. But maybe you mean to ask about trademark registration, which is a separate proactive step you can take to give your trademark more protection.

Re: Ask HN: Should I trademark prior to Y Combinator?

#32

There may be a strong push to change your name for various reasons. That would seem to make trademarking a waste of time. Paul Graham wrote about it a couple of years ago http://www.paulgraham.com/name.html

From that essay: > 100% of the top 20 YC companies by valuation have the .com of their name. 94% of the top 50 do. But only 66% of companies in the current batch have the .com of their name. Which suggests there are lessons ahead for most of the rest, one way or another. To me it suggests that having high valuations may be the cause of having the .com domain. A more useful analysis would be when companies that are no…

Yes, that stuck out to me as well. That was a poor way of conveying the point. The 34% of YC that do not have a .com will probably just buy it once they have the cash, regardless of whether or not they change the name.

Re: Ask HN: Should I trademark prior to Y Combinator?

#33

IP Lawyer here. Note: I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Upon using your name in commerce you acquire common law trademark rights. Filing a trademark before you are actually using it in commerce requires filing an Intent To Use trademark application and will cost you a few thousand dollars in legal fees (or a hell of a lot more if you are doing international) - either that or you are doing it yourself with trad…

Thank you for having the confidence to post and informed opinion from a lawyer perspective.*

I certainly appreciate the input.

*I recognize you are not acting as this person's lawyer :-)

Re: Ask HN: Should I trademark prior to Y Combinator?

#34

IP Lawyer here. Note: I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Upon using your name in commerce you acquire common law trademark rights. Filing a trademark before you are actually using it in commerce requires filing an Intent To Use trademark application and will cost you a few thousand dollars in legal fees (or a hell of a lot more if you are doing international) - either that or you are doing it yourself with trad…

[deleted]

Re: Ask HN: Should I trademark prior to Y Combinator?

#35

There may be a strong push to change your name for various reasons. That would seem to make trademarking a waste of time. Paul Graham wrote about it a couple of years ago http://www.paulgraham.com/name.html

From that essay: > 100% of the top 20 YC companies by valuation have the .com of their name. 94% of the top 50 do. But only 66% of companies in the current batch have the .com of their name. Which suggests there are lessons ahead for most of the rest, one way or another. To me it suggests that having high valuations may be the cause of having the .com domain. A more useful analysis would be when companies that are no…

The lesson is that once you have proven a concept and have raised more funds you can afford to pay the current holder of the domain that you desire?

Re: Ask HN: Should I trademark prior to Y Combinator?

#36
I could talk about this forever, but I'll restrain myself.

libertymcateer makes some great points. But I wanted to add two things:

1) For most people, when I think about registering a trademark, their concern is getting priority so that other people cannot jump in and use the same mark. Registering a trademark brings a host of benefits, but you don't need to register to get priority over later users. You just need to use the mark "in interstate commerce."

The problem for a company at your stage is this - chances are you are nowhere near the point that you could be said to be using the mark in interstate commerce. I'm assuming you aren't selling anything under the mark yet, right?

So, if you are really concerned about getting priority now, registration would have a benefit - you could file what libertymcateer referred to as an "intent to use" application. Your "priority date" would then be the date of your application, NOT the date the mark registers.

Eventually you will need to show that you are using the mark in commerce, but you can get up to 3 years to do that.

So, if really want to protect your mark now and are afraid someone might take it before you are already using it, then applying for a trademark registration can be worthwhile.

2) The other thing I tell companies in your position that are thinking about registering a trademark is to think about the time, effort, and resources they will be putting into building a brand around their desired trademark.

At the outset, it's easy to change branding. But let's say you start building some recognition around a name over the course of a year or two, start getting traction, etc..., and then you find out someone is already using the mark you chose as your brand or something confusingly similar. At that point, you will have sunk a bunch of money into a brand that needs to be changed and will have to start sinking that money in again.

Why might you think of registering at the outset, then? Well, as libertymcateer mentioned, you could do a search on TESS at the USPTO website. But it's a clunky search system and it's not even complete for your purpose.

If you are looking for prior users of a mark that could interfere with your right to start using a certain trademark, you need to look beyond marks that have been registered or for which people have applied to register. If someone is using a mark in commerce, but never applied to register, they can block your use. And none of those marks will appear on TESS.

In addition, it's not just identical marks. It's confusingly similar marks that can block your use. TESS can do some fuzzy searching, but you need to do those kinds of searches on a much broader basis.

If you file a trademark application, a trademark examiner will do searches and present objections if there are barriers to your getting trademark protection for a mark. No, it's not foolproof - they can approve a mark and a 3rd party can object. But it will be harder for a 3rd party to object if you actually are able to register the mark. That puts aside the credibility you get in having a registered trademark for a brand - random folks who want to write a cease and desist letter will more likely be deterred if you've registered the mark.

Now, applying to register the mark isn't the only way to get a better assessment of whether your chosen brand name would be a good choice from a trademark protection standpoint. There are trademark search services that can do a good job seeking out competing marks. But you really do need a lawyer to analyze the search results. That process will cost more than filing a trademark application. (The lowest risk thing to do would be to have a trademark search done, analyzed by a trademark attorney, and then filing an application to register, but the costs add up and I'm assuming cost is an issue here.)

So, essentially, filing a trademark application is relatively low-cost way to get an assessment of the legal viability of a name for trademark purposes, before you put your resources into building a brand around that name.

Just some things to think about.

Re: Ask HN: Should I trademark prior to Y Combinator?

#37

IP Lawyer here. Note: I am a lawyer, but I am not your lawyer. Upon using your name in commerce you acquire common law trademark rights. Filing a trademark before you are actually using it in commerce requires filing an Intent To Use trademark application and will cost you a few thousand dollars in legal fees (or a hell of a lot more if you are doing international) - either that or you are doing it yourself with trad…

Thanks for the intel. I love the disclaimer. Don't worry, I won't try to claim you :) My business is running under the current name, so i'm going to make it a goal to start the trademark app process via the USPTO sight by the end of the year. I don't have enough money to hire a lawyer as yet. I'm hoping to get into YC so that I can take care of this then. It's a unique name and I already own the domain and have a website running. This is all new to me, so I appreciate your intel.

Re: Ask HN: Should I trademark prior to Y Combinator?

#38

The idea that startups should wait until after joining an accelerator to do their filings seems a bit mythical to me. Maybe it worked back in the day when founders applied with only an idea (or no idea), but now I'd expect most companies to be pretty well established before entering an accelerator. C corp, restricted stock with vesting schedules, the whole bit. If you're already established with a public product, the…

Well I did recently apply to YC and prior to applying and read through the "How to successfully apply" and watch several video on their YouTube page. They advised against creating legal entity prior to YC because a mistake could be made and they even ask about this on the application. I have not created a legal entity as yet. However, this prompted me to investigate on the trademark matter. I just want to make sure i'm focusing on the important items first with the resources I have available and not jumping the gun.

Re: Ask HN: Should I trademark prior to Y Combinator?

#40
post #36

I could talk about this forever, but I'll restrain myself. libertymcateer makes some great points. But I wanted to add two things: 1) For most people, when I think about registering a trademark, their concern is getting priority so that other people cannot jump in and use the same mark. Registering a trademark brings a host of benefits, but you don't need to register to get priority over later users. You just need to…

Good intel. Thanks for sharing. I'm already selling my product under the name. I did do a search and nothing turned up so I don't believe anyone has trademarked anything as yet.
Post reply on HN