Earlier quoted context omitted.
Who cares what nation state actor alledgedly moved the exploits from an NSA employee to WikiLeaks? Why would the medium matter in the least, in the case of hoarding 0days?
I agree with this and want to further add to it. Firstly by saying: isn't it interesting that, if it is Russia who moved the exploits from the NSA employee / contractor to WikiLeaks then they (the Russians) have acted in the service of the global public. But let's not get distracted. The source of all NSA leaks is never some rogue employee, or contractor. It's never "The Russians"™ or "The Chinese"™ . The source of N…
In that light, the context is to reduce the impact of the NSA's necessary goals.
Higher up in the thread, it was claimed that one of the most feared branches of the intelligence arm of the most powerful government in the world was so incompetent that they had no idea who was behind these leaks, and that there was evidence to support this assertion. I have an open mind, so I was hoping to see this evidence.