Also, at the bottom of the page "This page is owned by Service Desk." What does that mean? And it's legal to publish a .GOV site using Drupal?
Drupal is all over government sites. So is Wordpress. Do you expect them to be using closed source CMSs or something? (I get that Drupal is insecure, but no, it's not "illegal" to use Drupal...)
“Users will only be able to view patents via HTTP. HTTPS will no longer work”
31–40 of 172 posts
Re: “Users will only be able to view patents via HTTP. HTTPS will no longer work”
#32The USPTO databases have to be one of the most torturous services to their users in the whole of internet. The UI of both the patent and trademark search is archaic, but not in a HN way but in a really bad way. In patent search, there is no "search" box. Instead, the "quick search" forces you to specify two (and exactly two) text queries on the database columns with obligatory boolean operation.[1] Even if you happen…
Probably the only thing keeping this from being abused is that it's the government, it's a low-value target, and they're paying millions upon millions for someone to support this trainwreck with security patches.
Re: “Users will only be able to view patents via HTTP. HTTPS will no longer work”
#33>Immediately after the maintenance, users will only be able to access Public PAIR through URLs beginning with HTTP, such as http://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair. Past URLs using HTTPS to access Public Pair, such as ...
A URL beginning with HTTPS ALSO begins with HTTP
Re: “Users will only be able to view patents via HTTP. HTTPS will no longer work”
#34Why on Earth could they possibly feel it necessary to do this? The United States Patent Office doesn't have a complex system of sub-domains or even an EV license, if money were the object then they could just go with Let's Encrypt (not to mention the current license continues until 2018 anyway). The amount of computing power it takes to encrypt with SSL is minimal, especially if you use some of the newer systems like…
Re: “Users will only be able to view patents via HTTP. HTTPS will no longer work”
#35Fun fact: HSTS https://securityheaders.io/?q=www.uspto.gov&followRedirects=... HSTS is 1 year at the time this comment is posted. They're in for some pain.
Re: “Users will only be able to view patents via HTTP. HTTPS will no longer work”
#36Re: “Users will only be able to view patents via HTTP. HTTPS will no longer work”
#37Re: “Users will only be able to view patents via HTTP. HTTPS will no longer work”
#38> beginning at 12:01 a.m., Friday, April 21 and ending at 2 a.m., Friday, April 21 ET.
> Immediately after the maintenance, users will only be able to access Public PAIR through URLs beginning with HTTP, such as http://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair . Past URLs using HTTPS to access Public Pair, such as https://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair , will no longer work. So it seems that the maintenance will turn of HTTPS, not that it's unavailable during the maintenance.
Re: “Users will only be able to view patents via HTTP. HTTPS will no longer work”
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would assume that they do it because HTTPS does complicate the pipeline on several different levels. If you want to tcpdump the https traffic, for example, you need to do SSL/TLS termination at the load balancer to get something readable. Most web servers don't make it easy to inject on the other side of the decryption; I remember having to enable some very verbose debug logs in nginx to accommodate this. Third-par…
You could easily terminate SSL at the LB or even just a proxy in front of the app. Sniffing the line after that is as trivial as turning a mirror port on the switch. In this day and age SSL is trivial and there is honestly no good reason to disable it. In fact protecting users privacy is a good reason they should switch to SSL only. I know you were only trying to coming up with some kind of reason but, there just isn…
HTTPS everywhere reduces the number of teams that used to, in the old "HTTP-only" world, serendipitously pitch in to help troubleshoot tickets. Now, instead of anybody within the network capable of sniffing HTTP packets, only one or two groups are limited to troubleshoot.
In your example, terminating SSL at the LB, or adding a proxy in front of the app, would either be an annoyance or major project, respectively. Small firms wouldn't think twice and would jump into action; but large organizations have too much internal inertia.
I see your point too, but the USPTO probably: a) is underfunded; and b) exhibits all the average capabilities and organizational "effectiveness" of a large bureaucracy.
Perhaps a better question is whether the USPTO would object to having their site content mirrored by a 3rd party better capable of offering features that users are complaining about (HTTPS & better search). Google has their own version[1].