Live data from Hacker News

Power Outages Coincide in LA, New York, and San Francisco

inverse.com

61–70 of 77 posts

Re: Power Outages Coincide in LA, New York, and San Francisco

#61
post #56

Anyone else read ted koppel's book?

Yea, came here to post about it. Was a riveting read with some great interviews. It being Ted Koppel, he got access to some really high placed people. [1] 1: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/22/books/review/lights-out-b...

One thing I liked about it was how he dove into how the incentives and limits on federal authority combine to make it very hard to get the power industries more tightly regulated wrt security/resilience

Re: Power Outages Coincide in LA, New York, and San Francisco

#62
I was once informed by someone working at a major energy company that if the utility frequency dropped to a certain specific value it could cause uncontrollable systemwide cascading blackouts. I don't remember the value, but I wish I did.

A large outage like SF, if it wasn't done in a controlled manner, could be grid overload. Or to prevent grid overload, utilities might need to shut down a regular on a high voltage supply line, which causes an overload somewhere else in the system, and automatic cutoff switches force a blackout.

Similar events have happened over the years starting in a remote state and ending in a California blackout. Often it's due to aging infrastructure which goes down unexpectedly, which then causes a chain reaction that hits other parts of the grid. If winds took down power lines in LA, this could cause a backup which could take out SF. It's possible that either LA or New York could have caused the SF blackout, or vice versa. If one part of the grid starts to go down it puts pressure on the rest, and things start to pop.

Note: I'm talking out my ass here, but it's based on news reports of previous outages.

Re: Power Outages Coincide in LA, New York, and San Francisco

#63
post #15
post #7

Crazy conspiracy theory: the Chinese and/or Russians have most likely already compromised our power grid and other infrastructure control systems and are waging covert economical war by disrupting important services.

It's a valid hypothesis and not crazy at all. If this were random I'd expect totally random cities, not the three most economically significant. It might not be covert economic warfare, but more of a covert demonstration whose audience is intended to be the US government. "We have lots of dangerous 0-days, and there's a lot more where these came from." In that case public credit would never be claimed. It reminds me…

not the three most economically significant

I don't think SF ranks in the top 3, I'm almost certain that Chicago would rank higher in economic significance, and I'd guess that Houston is above SF, probably Boston too.

Despite SF being so popular in the technology space, it's really quite a small city -- only around 800K people, compared to nearly 4M in LA, and 2.5M in Chicago.

EDIT: I found a ranking from 2010 and SF is #9

https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/06/america...

New York LA Chicago Wash DC Houston Dallas Philadelphia Boston SF

Re: Power Outages Coincide in LA, New York, and San Francisco

#65

I was once informed by someone working at a major energy company that if the utility frequency dropped to a certain specific value it could cause uncontrollable systemwide cascading blackouts. I don't remember the value, but I wish I did. A large outage like SF, if it wasn't done in a controlled manner, could be grid overload. Or to prevent grid overload, utilities might need to shut down a regular on a high voltage…

The power grid does not work like that. See this tutorial, "PJM 101" for background.[1] All of today's events are in distribution, not the HV transmission network. The NYC event involves tiny loads by grid standards. PJM isn't reporting any major emergencies today. Neither is CAISO.

[1] http://pjm.com/Globals/Training/Courses/ol-pjm-101.aspx

Re: Power Outages Coincide in LA, New York, and San Francisco

#66

I lived in NYC during the 2001 blackout. It was the first power outage since 1977. The lights don't go out in NYC...it's a really big deal when they do.

you mean 2003

You're right, it was 2003. I was only 21 when I moved there and it was all a bit of a blur.

Re: Power Outages Coincide in LA, New York, and San Francisco

#68
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not likely because of Hanlon's razor: "don't attribute to malice that which can adequately be explained by stupidity". [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor

This takes precedence: "Once is an accident. Twice is a coincidence. Three times is an enemy action" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Moscow_rules

Like with birthday paradox, denominator is important. Considering how many large cities and days there are, this might not be an unusual coincidence.

Re: Power Outages Coincide in LA, New York, and San Francisco

#69
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not likely because of Hanlon's razor: "don't attribute to malice that which can adequately be explained by stupidity". [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon%27s_razor

Hanlon's Razor is not an established law of reasoning or of philosophy. Quoting it is not a valid counter argument without additional reasoning given.

That's why I said "not likely" rather than "impossible". It's just conservative Bayesian prior.

Remember last time nefarious hackers infecting computers at power plants were in the news, that later turned out to be antivirus finding some spam on completely unrelated computer?

Re: Power Outages Coincide in LA, New York, and San Francisco

#70
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hanlon's Razor is not an established law of reasoning or of philosophy. Quoting it is not a valid counter argument without additional reasoning given.

That's why I said "not likely" rather than "impossible". It's just conservative Bayesian prior. Remember last time nefarious hackers infecting computers at power plants were in the news, that later turned out to be antivirus finding some spam on completely unrelated computer?

It's hard to imagine you really understand Bayesian statistics when you mention what happened the last time as support for your point. It is quite hard to believe that you know with reasonable degree of accuracy the probabilities involved.
Post reply on HN