Live data from Hacker News

Twitter launches own shortener t.co

blog.twitter.com

81–90 of 118 posts

Re: Twitter launches own shortener t.co

#81
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

.co is a huge opportunity for squatters. I can't tell you how many times I've typed "site.co" instead of "site.com" because I hit enter too quickly. For legitimate uses, it's terrible. Imagine having to say "that's co NOT com... see-oh. no M!" every time you give out your domain.

This is ridiculous... why is this TLD being allowed? Its main use is going to be abuse, ranging from squatting to phishing (chase.co, paypal.co, anyone?).

It looks like they're giving trademarks registered before 2008 first dibs, so as long as those big companies' IT departments are on the ball, they can pre-empt the squatters.

Re: Twitter launches own shortener t.co

#82
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

.co is a huge opportunity for squatters. I can't tell you how many times I've typed "site.co" instead of "site.com" because I hit enter too quickly. For legitimate uses, it's terrible. Imagine having to say "that's co NOT com... see-oh. no M!" every time you give out your domain.

> .co is a huge opportunity for squatters. You can get them at under a $1 per domain too if you bulk order them. But since it's a pre-order, the people who pay $300 get priority. I don't understand why they don't auction off the obviously desirable domains, like they're doing with the 1 letter domains.

It sounds like any domain that has more than one pre-registrant will be auctioned.

If you're the only one who request a particular domain, you get it cheap though.

Re: Twitter launches own shortener t.co

#83
post #63

I wonder when some tiny country will decide to just turn their entire top-level national TLD into a url shortener.

This has been done: http://to./ HN: http://to./4dw2 Note that the 'dot' (in to.) is necessary to make the hostname absolute, so it doesn't fail in pretty much every browser. Otherwise, the URL should just be: http://to/

http://to./ urls are not recognized by twitter.

Re: Twitter launches own shortener t.co

#84
post #8

From users' perspective, the big thing here is that clients can now show where links in tweets actually lead. For brevity, the link text should probably just be the domain it leads to, but it should make things a whole lot more readable. Before - This is a great news site: http://bit.ly/2Mp91y After - This is a great news site: news.ycombinator.com A loss for URL shortener services, but a win for users.

As I interpreted it, Twitter is not going to longify links. The display_url entity will be the exactly link passed in by the user. So if a user pastes in a bit.ly link, it will still show the bit.ly link.

Re: Twitter launches own shortener t.co

#85
post #2

It will also be expanding the size of the tweet to 140 not including the URI and providing expanded URIs in addition to the shortened link. More information at http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/brow...

Incorrect. The 140 characters includes the length of the t.co link (19 characters), not whatever the original link was.

Re: Twitter launches own shortener t.co

#86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is an excuse. At most, they need to shorten the links only for SMS; they don't need to shorten them for the API or for the website (as they've just demonstrated).

I can click on links that come in via SMS on my Droid. Why kill that emerging functionality? Edit: I completely read what you said incorrectly. My response must make no sense.

Next time, just delete the post.

Re: Twitter launches own shortener t.co

#87
I think URL shorteners are cool, and all the rage, but: - I remember when del.icio.us/ came out. Not that it's a shortener, but they all have this clever naming crap. When you're not able to click the link, it's awfully hard to remember-- okay, did the first period come after the first three letters? What's the bottom domain, again? How do you even spell delicious? Did they spell it right?

- There's an implicit trust that must be made before expecting a user to click on any shortened URL. Since you can't follow it through to the content without actually clicking on it, there's no way of knowing whether you're headed to a clever browser hijack (or worse)!

- Which brings us to the work-safe barrier that most everyone who works a real job has. Websense, in most cases, blocks anything that's streaming media, TV, porn, advertisements, gambling, etc. etc. etc. And then it logs it, and it logs which user accesses it. When I'm at work, I'm pretty judicious-- I don't want to be recorded as clicking on YouTube links, or listening to Kanye West's latest gaffe, let alone going to Facebook or Myspace. URL shortners completely obfuscate where the link is taking you-- so the damage is done without you even knowing what choice you make. Therefore, unless I'm absolutely certain it came from someone I know, and it's specified what it is, I'm not clicking that shit. Which brings us back to implicit trust.

Most people don't check the links first, or even do this 'trust check' before they click on links. How long until we see, "Woman fired for watching Jack Johnson video on company time?" (accidentally, of course). It shouldn't be that way, but it will be before too long.

Re: Twitter launches own shortener t.co

#88
post #74
post #71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Generic shortened URLs are becoming a plague upon the web and are marginally useful at best outside of Twitter Marginally useful at best outside of Twitter? Care to explain? Less than 1% of bitly's traffic is coming from twtitter, so obviously there are other people that find value in trackable URLs... I'm curious why you think it isn't useful?

URL shortners break the web in many ways. Link rot, link hijack, it takes longer to reach the page, additional point of failure and domain based algorithms break. In other words, plague.

Well, OK.

But being able to pop in a nice terse URL where a long one would break in some E-mail client is handy.

Re: Twitter launches own shortener t.co

#89
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

URL shortners break the web in many ways. Link rot, link hijack, it takes longer to reach the page, additional point of failure and domain based algorithms break. In other words, plague.

Well, OK. But being able to pop in a nice terse URL where a long one would break in some E-mail client is handy.

Join us in the 21st century and use HTML emails. You can use any text on a link, amazing huh?

Re: Twitter launches own shortener t.co

#90

What is wrong with these people, just fix twitter so url's don't count to the count. Morons. There's no better user experience to a shortened url, it's like having unprotected sex with a random in a nightclub, you've no idea what you could end up with. Repeat after me, shortened urls break the web and are inherently evil.

But then the tweet can't be sent in a text message anymore, and everyone has there tweets sent to their mobile phone.
Post reply on HN