Systemd: tmpfiles: R /dir/.* destroys root
1–10 of 21 posts
Re: Systemd: tmpfiles: R /dir/.* destroys root
#2Re: Systemd: tmpfiles: R /dir/.* destroys root
#3"@poettering locked and limited conversation to collaborators 34 minutes ago."
Re: Systemd: tmpfiles: R /dir/.* destroys root
#4"@poettering locked and limited conversation to collaborators 34 minutes ago."
Re: Systemd: tmpfiles: R /dir/.* destroys root
#5edit: unintentional italics
Re: Systemd: tmpfiles: R /dir/.* destroys root
#6Re: Systemd: tmpfiles: R /dir/.* destroys root
#7The one good thing about this is that they did not close it as 'won't fix'.
Re: Systemd: tmpfiles: R /dir/.* destroys root
#8says Poettering.
Re: Systemd: tmpfiles: R /dir/.* destroys root
#9This almost seems like a generational clash. Anybody who's been around for a while knows that you never ever type rm -rf .* because it can blow up in your face. Lennart's response is tone-deaf because he can't understand how anybody could make that mistake. He's never noticed that rm has started refusing to let you shoot yourself in the foot because he would never think of typing rm -rf .* in the first place. Newer u…
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/utilities/rm....
"The rm utility is forbidden to remove the names dot and dot-dot in order to avoid the consequences of inadvertently doing ..."
Re: Systemd: tmpfiles: R /dir/.* destroys root
#10This almost seems like a generational clash. Anybody who's been around for a while knows that you never ever type rm -rf .* because it can blow up in your face. Lennart's response is tone-deaf because he can't understand how anybody could make that mistake. He's never noticed that rm has started refusing to let you shoot yourself in the foot because he would never think of typing rm -rf .* in the first place. Newer u…
Yeah it is unix, it is the kind of unix that you only find running on some old DEC somewhere. Not on a modern x86 cluster.
This while presenting systemd as being about making Linux something more than a unix clone.
And when people complain about systemd not being unix, it is about how everything is blobbed together via interfaces that keep changing at the whim of the developers.
This in contrast to how someone can pipe the output of a GNU command to the input of a BSD command and get sane results, because the interfaces are known and fixed.
People would be much more accommodating of systemd if the logind part could be used independently of the init part etc.