Live data from Hacker News

Iphone 4.0 official video

apple.com

41–50 of 177 posts

Re: Iphone 4.0 official video

#41
I just walked into our office lunch room where a bunch of non-technical / non-gadget people were talking about the video conferencing capabilities of the new iphone . . .

I think that feature is going to be a monster commercial success that every other phone immediately copies.

Will probably be the only point that we hear about on the local news / etc rather than Steve's consolidated 8-points . . .

Re: Iphone 4.0 official video

#42
post #18
post #5

The way they have made this video it looks as if they had come up with the definite cure to cancer, aids, etc ... I don't like it.

anybody else think its hilarious that this comment gets downvoted to oblivion?

Not really?

"Company markets Product as if it is a Big Deal that people should Definitely Buy" is hardly an interesting or insightful observation.

Re: Iphone 4.0 official video

#44
post #39
post #8

Eh, requires Quicktime. Hooray for the Open Web. I'll just take your word that it's really shiny.

They seem to be using the video-tag: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4073000/html5.png Don’t know what’s going on with QuickTime – maybe a fallback if your browser won’t play h.264? Does it work on Chrome without QuickTime? (– edit: Three people [who downvoted me] seem to think that formulating a reasonable hypothesis and asking reasonable questions because of conflicting information is already too much Apple love. Or maybe…

Didn't work on Chrome/Win7 without installing Quicktime for me.

Re: Iphone 4.0 official video

#45
post #39
post #8

Eh, requires Quicktime. Hooray for the Open Web. I'll just take your word that it's really shiny.

They seem to be using the video-tag: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4073000/html5.png Don’t know what’s going on with QuickTime – maybe a fallback if your browser won’t play h.264? Does it work on Chrome without QuickTime? (– edit: Three people [who downvoted me] seem to think that formulating a reasonable hypothesis and asking reasonable questions because of conflicting information is already too much Apple love. Or maybe…

I run midori [1] on a freebsd machine, it works somewhat well (audio problems) with html5 video on youtube. Quicktime is not a fallback, it's still the standard.

edit: forgot the link [1] http://www.twotoasts.de/

Re: Iphone 4.0 official video

#46
post #41

I just walked into our office lunch room where a bunch of non-technical / non-gadget people were talking about the video conferencing capabilities of the new iphone . . . I think that feature is going to be a monster commercial success that every other phone immediately copies. Will probably be the only point that we hear about on the local news / etc rather than Steve's consolidated 8-points . . .

Apple saying that it will submit video-conf stuff as an open standard indicates that it is in Apple's interest for other makers to implement this feature in a similar fashion.

Re: Iphone 4.0 official video

#47
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

anybody else think its hilarious that this comment gets downvoted to oblivion?

I was wondering the same. Perhaps it's because it's a very obvious statement? Apple routinely purport its products are perfect, that every detail is a facet of the best craftsmanship on Earth, use gaping-mouth words ("sooo perfect") and giggles of joy. Apple markets its products as technology beyond cutting-edge: they are superhuman, perhaps built by aliens and bestowed upon us mortals, things that change our lives a…

Why wouldn't you try to make your new product seem as "incredible" as possible?

Re: Iphone 4.0 official video

#48
post #41

I just walked into our office lunch room where a bunch of non-technical / non-gadget people were talking about the video conferencing capabilities of the new iphone . . . I think that feature is going to be a monster commercial success that every other phone immediately copies. Will probably be the only point that we hear about on the local news / etc rather than Steve's consolidated 8-points . . .

I don't get it. Videoconferencing is insanely old and never took off. First there was ISDN video conferencing.. apart from the job at a telco i did once i've never actually seen one that was used.

Second, the first UMTS mobile i got had video conferencing, that's really a long time ago (Motorola V980 btw.) and many UMTS phones shipped with the second camera for years now. Yet, noone ever used it. Atleast i've never seen or heard of someone, although technically i could have done that with most people i know for years.

Is it that this feature was never available in the U.S.? Or why is this news over there?

Also, i've probably overread some feature that distinguishes it from the old UMTS way.

Re: Iphone 4.0 official video

#50
post #32
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They did that back in 2004 when iChat AV was introduced, and AV didn't disrupt or shift habits away from traditional audio and text. I think video conferencing is a great feature no doubt, but it's largely too intrusive for most people. Certainly making it more accessible and standardized will help some however, even amongst the most savvy early adopters (and MM+ of college students with MacBooks), video chatting has…

Maybe not for most people. But there is a large segment of people (primarily younger than the readership of this site) who use iChat AV _all_ the time, and they wouldn't do so if they didn't all have Macs with iSight cameras and iChat AV. Old people are slow to change and sometimes never do. As we get old, we've got to remember that the failure of a product to change our ways of behaving is not proof that it will not…

My company/startup uses iChat AV for video conferencing pretty much daily. Huge fan. My wife uses it with friends and family. My mom and my sister use it several times a week.
Post reply on HN