Live data from Hacker News

A man wouldn’t leave an overbooked United flight, so he was dragged off

washingtonpost.com

11–20 of 549 posts

Re: A man wouldn’t leave an overbooked United flight, so he was dragged off

#11
post #3
post #2

Legalities and contracts aside, I don't see why an airline would allow someone to board, and then remove them. That just can't end well.

Sounds like it wasn't the normal overbooking procedure - it was overfull because of united employees.

Perhaps, but why let too many people past the final boarding gate check?

Re: A man wouldn’t leave an overbooked United flight, so he was dragged off

#12
Buried at the bottom:

> "The airline eventually cleared everyone from the plane, Bridges said, and did not let them back on until the man was removed a second time — in a stretcher."

My reading is they beat him so badly they had to put him in a stretcher. Is that right?

Re: A man wouldn’t leave an overbooked United flight, so he was dragged off

#14
post #3
post #2

Legalities and contracts aside, I don't see why an airline would allow someone to board, and then remove them. That just can't end well.

Sounds like it wasn't the normal overbooking procedure - it was overfull because of united employees.

United employees taking passenger's seats? That's not overbooked. That's robbery.

Re: A man wouldn’t leave an overbooked United flight, so he was dragged off

#15
post #6

Someone on a different message board put this situation very well: By the letter of the law, United was correct - morally, they were not. Their 'contract of carriage' allows them to IDB (Involuntary Deny Boarding) to passengers due to overselling, and bump people off at-will. Depending on how delayed the passenger would be to their final destination, they would owe compensation (up to a max of $1350) for the trouble.…

Legally - is this considered assault?

Re: A man wouldn’t leave an overbooked United flight, so he was dragged off

#16
post #4
post #2

Legalities and contracts aside, I don't see why an airline would allow someone to board, and then remove them. That just can't end well.

Very little that airlines do appears logical, looking from the outside in. Especially United. I've never had so much as a mediocre experience flying with them - it's always been notably terrible.

What exactly makes the experience terrible? Are you exaggerating? There is nothing to it, you buy your ticket, and sit in a seat. It's the same boring routine.

Re: A man wouldn’t leave an overbooked United flight, so he was dragged off

#17
post #14
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sounds like it wasn't the normal overbooking procedure - it was overfull because of united employees.

United employees taking passenger's seats? That's not overbooked. That's robbery.

No, it's robbery if United doesn't compensate you for denying your boarding.

Re: A man wouldn’t leave an overbooked United flight, so he was dragged off

#18
post #11
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sounds like it wasn't the normal overbooking procedure - it was overfull because of united employees.

Perhaps, but why let too many people past the final boarding gate check?

The plane was full before all the United employees showed up? Yeah they should have gotten there sooner, but in previous situations when I knew the plane would wait on me I've been the last to board...

Re: A man wouldn’t leave an overbooked United flight, so he was dragged off

#19
post #5

Today must be a fun day to be on United's PR team.

Tough day for them, but now tomorrow I'm sure customers will be a lot more compliant and willing to take arbitrary orders to save the airline money, and that will make everyone's job easier. #WorthIt

Re: A man wouldn’t leave an overbooked United flight, so he was dragged off

#20
post #8

The outrage mob is pushing this pretty hard. Booting people off a plane is pretty shitty behavior for an airline. It's bad customer service and they should dealt with it earlier than after boarding. But if they have to do it, the passenger shouldn't be allowed to just refuse. This guy did. And he had to get dragged off the plane. I don't really see an alternative other than just letting anyone willing to scream to st…

I think you're wrong. They should have upped their monetary incentive until someone left voluntarily. It was their business fuckup, not the passenger's, and they should pay for it.
Post reply on HN