Live data from Hacker News

Why Is There No New "Einstein"?

scribd.com

21–30 of 34 posts

Re: Why Is There No New "Einstein"?

#21
post #3

It's a "scribd.com" link, but it looks like now it's smart enough to not bother with the wonky Flash plugin for Mac users, and just send us to the PDF. Yay!

The PDF is encrypted, and we can't convert encrypted PDFs to iPaper. In this case we just allow the original PDF to be downloaded.

Re: Why Is There No New "Einstein"?

#22
post #2

This is a very interesting question, but unfortunately in this case the author's answer is just the standard scientist's whine: "There's not enough funding for my kind of research". Better possible answers include: a) The time isn't right for the emergence of another Einstein just now b) There are several around, we're just not paying attention c) Einstein was really more of a media phenomenon than a physicist, and h…

a) The time isn't right for the emergence of another Einstein just now

this is the big one. scientific breakthroughs move in waves, it's not just the right person but also being in the right place and time. However I believe that with all the holes being poked in the Standard Model by dark matter/energy and the fact that we STILL have no idea what gravity actually is, we're headed for another Einstein popping up.

Re: Why Is There No New "Einstein"?

#23
post #2

This is a very interesting question, but unfortunately in this case the author's answer is just the standard scientist's whine: "There's not enough funding for my kind of research". Better possible answers include: a) The time isn't right for the emergence of another Einstein just now b) There are several around, we're just not paying attention c) Einstein was really more of a media phenomenon than a physicist, and h…

Actually, to my great surprise, "give my field more money" was only one of his suggestions. It was, in fact, the last suggestion of his, and (at least to my reading) least important. The rest of his answer is quite reasonable, and doesn't even need new money: 1. Seek out people with different points of view and invite them to join the discussion. 2. Give money/influence to individuals, not to large fiefdoms/research…

"Diversity of ideas is important, ..."

Wouldn't that be, diversity of informed ideas is important?

Why might it be that people with the background to have an informed opinion on something do not show greater diversity in those opinions? (Or maybe they are there, and politics keeps them out of the inner circle?)

Re: Why Is There No New "Einstein"?

#24
post #5

The simple truth is that great scientist are simply a a rare event. How many scientists with the capacity of Einstein have there been? Newton, maybe Aristotle and Archimedes. That's four in the last two thousand years. The capacity of scientists (genius, output or however you define it) most probably follows a powerlaw with a lot of mediocre scientists, a few outstanding (Louis Pasteur, Henry Cavendish, Louis Maxwell…

"The simple truth is that great scientist are simply a a rare event. How many scientists with the capacity of Einstein have there been? "

FFTW

(Feynman for the win)

Re: Why Is There No New "Einstein"?

#25
post #5

The simple truth is that great scientist are simply a a rare event. How many scientists with the capacity of Einstein have there been? Newton, maybe Aristotle and Archimedes. That's four in the last two thousand years. The capacity of scientists (genius, output or however you define it) most probably follows a powerlaw with a lot of mediocre scientists, a few outstanding (Louis Pasteur, Henry Cavendish, Louis Maxwell…

"The simple truth is that great scientist are simply a a rare event. How many scientists with the capacity of Einstein have there been? " FFTW (Feynman for the win)

FFTW FTW. Fastest fourier transform in the west FTW! oh.

Re: Why Is There No New "Einstein"?

#26
post #2

This is a very interesting question, but unfortunately in this case the author's answer is just the standard scientist's whine: "There's not enough funding for my kind of research". Better possible answers include: a) The time isn't right for the emergence of another Einstein just now b) There are several around, we're just not paying attention c) Einstein was really more of a media phenomenon than a physicist, and h…

f) approaching singularity

Re: Why Is There No New "Einstein"?

#27
Luboš Motl has several responses to this question on his blog:

http://motls.blogspot.com/2005/06/why-no-new-einstein.html

http://motls.blogspot.com/2005/09/why-no-new-einstein-ii.htm...

This one isn't directly addressed to the Smolin piece, but it addresses the "No New Einstein" question:

http://motls.blogspot.com/2007/09/bad-physicists-and-populis...

Re: Why Is There No New "Einstein"?

#28
post #5

The simple truth is that great scientist are simply a a rare event. How many scientists with the capacity of Einstein have there been? Newton, maybe Aristotle and Archimedes. That's four in the last two thousand years. The capacity of scientists (genius, output or however you define it) most probably follows a powerlaw with a lot of mediocre scientists, a few outstanding (Louis Pasteur, Henry Cavendish, Louis Maxwell…

How many scientists with the capacity of Einstein have there been? Newton, maybe Aristotle and Archimedes. That's four in the last two thousand years. Look, I admire these guys as much as anyone. But Zombie Einstein himself would come back from the dead and smack you if he heard you claim that, e.g., Maxwell wasn't as smart as he was. Einstein figured out special relativity by staring at Maxwell's equations, after al…

If you ever write a book on popular science in that prose please let me know. I wan to buy it.

Re: Why Is There No New "Einstein"?

#29

two words: computer science. All our great minds are busy learning how to program.

That's actually quite funny. I met a prominent CS professor at a major school (think top 10) who admitted he doesn't know any programming languages (C, java, etc.).
Post reply on HN