Benchmarking shared memory vs message passing on OS X
blog.antoniofrighetto.com
Benchmarking shared memory vs message passing on OS X
1–10 of 28 posts
Re: Benchmarking shared memory vs message passing on OS X
#2Sorry for being rude.
Re: Benchmarking shared memory vs message passing on OS X
#3Yep. Nothing to see here
Re: Benchmarking shared memory vs message passing on OS X
#4> I have done multiple tests and then took an average, don't know how much these results can be reliable (since to get statistics more plausible we perhaps should have allocated much more memory). Yep. Nothing to see here
Re: Benchmarking shared memory vs message passing on OS X
#5> I have done multiple tests and then took an average, don't know how much these results can be reliable (since to get statistics more plausible we perhaps should have allocated much more memory). Yep. Nothing to see here
Re: Benchmarking shared memory vs message passing on OS X
#6There are no graphs, how is this a benchmark?
Re: Benchmarking shared memory vs message passing on OS X
#7It is not really benchmarking. And not really about shared memory. Sorry for being rude.
Re: Benchmarking shared memory vs message passing on OS X
#8Sidebar: Apple's desktop operating system hasn't been called OS X for almost a year. There are no graphs, how is this a benchmark?
Re: Benchmarking shared memory vs message passing on OS X
#9> I have done multiple tests and then took an average, don't know how much these results can be reliable (since to get statistics more plausible we perhaps should have allocated much more memory). Yep. Nothing to see here
Re: Benchmarking shared memory vs message passing on OS X
#10> I have done multiple tests and then took an average, don't know how much these results can be reliable (since to get statistics more plausible we perhaps should have allocated much more memory). Yep. Nothing to see here