Mexican Newspaper Shuts Down, Saying It Is Too Dangerous to Continue
11–20 of 435 posts
Re: Mexican Newspaper Shuts Down, Saying It Is Too Dangerous to Continue
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed, but let's make that even more general. No need to limit that to "real journalists", since then you're just asking for people to build an ivory tower and use it as a power base for control of "non-real" "journalists". Everyone needs to be free to speak their minds. Freedom of speech is for everyone.
Journalists need more than freedom of speech, they also need freedom to investigate. I suspect handing that to everyone is still ok, but speech is not enough.
Re: Mexican Newspaper Shuts Down, Saying It Is Too Dangerous to Continue
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed, but let's make that even more general. No need to limit that to "real journalists", since then you're just asking for people to build an ivory tower and use it as a power base for control of "non-real" "journalists". Everyone needs to be free to speak their minds. Freedom of speech is for everyone.
Journalists need more than freedom of speech, they also need freedom to investigate. I suspect handing that to everyone is still ok, but speech is not enough.
Re: Mexican Newspaper Shuts Down, Saying It Is Too Dangerous to Continue
#14* https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/apr/11/women-onl...
* http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womenintheworld/2016/07/29/femini...
* https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22429996-000-the-figh...
* http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3454588/Women-game...
Re: Mexican Newspaper Shuts Down, Saying It Is Too Dangerous to Continue
#15This is why real journalist need to be protected regardless where you stand on the issues. It's a pillar of democracy for a very important reason.
The problem is that these days, everyone has a different definition of "real journalist," and the group of people who fit that definition tend to be strongly correlated with the group of people who agree with the definer politically.
Then, the "real journalist" could be just a matter of having capability, devotion and determination, not a class of people with special status.
Unfortunately too much of "journalism" is nowadays just activism, using their position to try to influence others (end even shut down the voice of other people because they think this is even more effective influencing).
Re: Mexican Newspaper Shuts Down, Saying It Is Too Dangerous to Continue
#16No offense (really), but I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that you're a guy, because ... * https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/apr/11/women-onl... * http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womenintheworld/2016/07/29/femini... * https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22429996-000-the-figh... * http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3454588/Women-game...
Some twit threatening you does mean that your life is at risk; a drug lord trying to kill you does.
Re: Mexican Newspaper Shuts Down, Saying It Is Too Dangerous to Continue
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed, but let's make that even more general. No need to limit that to "real journalists", since then you're just asking for people to build an ivory tower and use it as a power base for control of "non-real" "journalists". Everyone needs to be free to speak their minds. Freedom of speech is for everyone.
Exactly. And "Freedom of Speech" is a broad term, with a wide variety of implications. Freedom of speech also means being able to channel ideas that aren't as popular and most of the mainstream media may not agree with. People should be able to express those ideas as well.
No. There is no place in the world for antisemitism, homophobia or other right-extremist views. These "opinions" are direct threats to people. And when the state, as it often does, fails to protect the marginalized, then in my opinion nearly anything is acceptable to stop these "opinions" from being expressed.
We in Germany already have seen what happens when you let Nazis speak out and act in free, and the same goes for Stalinist ideologies - and also in America we see what happens. Evil to the core, all of it.
Re: Mexican Newspaper Shuts Down, Saying It Is Too Dangerous to Continue
#18No offense (really), but I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that you're a guy, because ... * https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/apr/11/women-onl... * http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womenintheworld/2016/07/29/femini... * https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22429996-000-the-figh... * http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3454588/Women-game...
Re: Mexican Newspaper Shuts Down, Saying It Is Too Dangerous to Continue
#19This is why real journalist need to be protected regardless where you stand on the issues. It's a pillar of democracy for a very important reason.
Agreed, but let's make that even more general. No need to limit that to "real journalists", since then you're just asking for people to build an ivory tower and use it as a power base for control of "non-real" "journalists". Everyone needs to be free to speak their minds. Freedom of speech is for everyone.
Re: Mexican Newspaper Shuts Down, Saying It Is Too Dangerous to Continue
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Exactly. And "Freedom of Speech" is a broad term, with a wide variety of implications. Freedom of speech also means being able to channel ideas that aren't as popular and most of the mainstream media may not agree with. People should be able to express those ideas as well.
> People should be able to express those ideas as well No. There is no place in the world for antisemitism, homophobia or other right-extremist views. These "opinions" are direct threats to people. And when the state, as it often does, fails to protect the marginalized, then in my opinion nearly anything is acceptable to stop these "opinions" from being expressed. We in Germany already have seen what happens when you…