Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Fake SMTP server as a service

develmail.com

31–40 of 91 posts

Re: Show HN: Fake SMTP server as a service

#31
post #14

You can just use MailHog for free, it works pretty good. https://github.com/mailhog/MailHog

I'm a fan of MailHog. It's simple for the whole team to setup and the optional chaos monkey button is a great way to make sure your email system can tolerate periodic failures properly.

It works locally and is really simple to setup for shared staging/prerelease environments, handles high volumes really well and the websocket auto-update system is great.

Personally, I'm a fan of using Mailhog for local and Mailtrap.io for shared environments because in my experience, non-technical testers have a better experience with Mailtrap and it's simple tie ins to review the look of emails on different platforms/clients.

Basically, Mailhog for local sending, does it send, can it handle failure, etc and Mailtrap.io for "does it look right?".

Re: Show HN: Fake SMTP server as a service

#36
post #13

I don't like the idea of external SMTP for this when http://danfarrelly.nyc/MailDev/ can make everything works locally - and it's very easy to add in our Docker based projects.

SMTP4dev is a good option for Windows.

Personally I use Papercut and so far I'm pretty happy.

Re: Show HN: Fake SMTP server as a service

#37

Is this something people would actually pay for? Why not just set up a box running Postfix with a catch-all address and an outbound block on 25/TCP?

You answered your own question: that is a lot more work than using either this or one of the purpose-made packages like papercut or smtp4dev.
Post reply on HN