Every attempt to manage academia makes it worse
1–10 of 313 posts
Re: Every attempt to manage academia makes it worse
#2Re: Every attempt to manage academia makes it worse
#3Similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne_effect ?
Re: Every attempt to manage academia makes it worse
#4>as soon as you try to measure how well people are doing, they will switch to optimising for whatever you’re measuring, rather than putting their best efforts into actually doing good work Similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne_effect ?
Re: Every attempt to manage academia makes it worse
#5The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle has found a new refuge. While atoms are evading it ([1]), people implement it.
[1] https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/atomic-spins-evad...
Re: Every attempt to manage academia makes it worse
#6Re: Every attempt to manage academia makes it worse
#7Sounds very reasonable. Does anybody have good examples of this approach? I have the impression that this is similar to the environment of Bell Labs during the "golden years".
Re: Every attempt to manage academia makes it worse
#8[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalist_Realism:_Is_there_n...
Re: Every attempt to manage academia makes it worse
#9I'm sure this resonates with university lecturers all over the Western world. The late writer and university academic Mark Fisher has some interesting points about this effect in his 2009 book "Capitalist Realism: Is there no alternative?"[0]. He saw it as an inevitable byproduct of the infiltration of neo-liberal ideology into the academic sphere. Setting targets and measuring performance indicators are justified wi…
Ideologies (and ideas) are, in my view, stronger than facts, which often only represent the past, while ideas shape the future.
(these days the word "fact" is a bit of a trigger, but I thought about that well before all that jazz, and the current phenomenom seemed to prove my point to many of my friends)