Live data from Hacker News

Some Tips to Improve the Civility on Hacker News

bothsidesofthetable.com

11–20 of 83 posts

Re: Some Tips to Improve the Civility on Hacker News

#11
post #6

The civility on HN is unparallelled. This community, with pg's guidance has done an amazing job of fostering a thoughtful community for intelligent discussion. Suster's arguments all focus around one particular discussion in which emotions ran a little higher than usual, and are not, in my opinion, representative of the community as a whole. As for Suster's suggestions, the first one would be a mistake. There are man…

Let's not get too self-congratulatory here. Yes, the civility on HN is much higher than on many other discussion sites, but it's still a lot lower than you'd find in most real-world situations.

I agree that throwaway accounts are useful, and that there are times when anonymity is advantageous, and that the added civility that comes with real names is a bad tradeoff in this case.

However: in this case, the second point (downvoting) didn't prevent an uncivil (yet insightful) comment from becoming the highest ranked comment in the thread.

I'm not saying Suster's suggested fixes are good ones-- but I don't think we should dismiss the problematic out of hand.

Unchecked nastiness and incivility are the broken windows of the online community.

Re: Some Tips to Improve the Civility on Hacker News

#12
I don't know about using real names. People use real names on Facebook, and i've seen some very nasty stuff there after wandering into the wrong groups by accident.

There just needs to be a way, and a culture, of playing the ball and not the man. Most of use are OK with the substance of our arguments being torn apart, but aren't ok with abuse. Sadly there are many who can't do the former so always stick the latter, like quarreling bullies in the schoolyard. Maybe that's where they are from.

Re: Some Tips to Improve the Civility on Hacker News

#13
His complaint seems to partly center on the amount of swear words... one reason I prefer HN over other communities is we are not scared of the word fuck. Swearing is a part of honest society (and, luckily, gratuitous swearing is downmodded to oblivion in my experience).

Why did pw0ncakes get upvoted. a) because he is probably right but b) mostly because he accurately represents his generations reaction to things like this (and, lets face it, the original post was rather silly/incindary)

My suggestions (which will not be popular with many of Ycombinator’s hackers but may meet your goal of civility).

And here's the problem with this entire post; it adopts the same slightly sneering, "peering down on us" tone. It's not overtly rude - but no better, really, than "fucking asshole" (once you get over the swear word).

It's not, actually, a post about improving civility on HN - it's a thinly veiled attack/return shot :)

Ok, I'm not going to support calling the guy and asshole (he sounds like a bit of an idjit, I think, reading through the various posts/comments etc. and the original post he made before the updates did sound a bit "asshole") and, yes, there is a slightly growing problem of attacks over fair argument here in HN comments. But this is still a stellar community; positive suggestions are good, sneering resentment, probably not :)

Send me alerts when comments come in on a story I’ve written

That's silly; just monitor your logs if you want to see when HN comments come up (or set up a google alert etc.).

But actually I would prefer not encouraging people to come here to write about their posts unless they are already a member, reasoning:

- they are probably not "up" on how things work here, and so it risks going downhill

- comments here can be acerbic and honest, and people do take offense at that (which seems unfair to the writer)

By all means if it benefits the discussion invite him/her in. Otherwise leave it be :)

Re: Some Tips to Improve the Civility on Hacker News

#14
post #2

Those comments he linked to did contain actual arguments. They also contained insults, which is unfortunate, but they were definitely not merely ad hominems. I would not have problems with such comments directed at myself. As long as there are well written, structured arguments in there a insult won’t annoy me. Well, it probably will, but not very much. I think it‘s also important to note that this is a controversial…

I think that insults combined with actual arguments are worse than plain insults, because the latter are easy to ignore.

The only trolls that ever got to me were the ones that combined them.

Also, the guidelines are quite clear on shortening responses (http://ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html - bottom of frontpage):

> When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. E.g. "That is an idiotic thing to say; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3."

Re: Some Tips to Improve the Civility on Hacker News

#15
post #6

The civility on HN is unparallelled. This community, with pg's guidance has done an amazing job of fostering a thoughtful community for intelligent discussion. Suster's arguments all focus around one particular discussion in which emotions ran a little higher than usual, and are not, in my opinion, representative of the community as a whole. As for Suster's suggestions, the first one would be a mistake. There are man…

I actually rather like that HN doesn't do email notifications or an RSS feed of your own comments/replies.

Re: Some Tips to Improve the Civility on Hacker News

#16

    > I have thick enough skin or I wouldn’t blog.  
...

    > It’s totally acceptable to me for people to harshly criticize my  
    > points-of-view. No problem.  But calling me a f***ing a**hole or some  
    > of the other epithets used goes too far.
Does not compute.

Though I agree with you that such language is not nice and can be (should be) avoided as much as possible. Some people sometimes have bad days and certain topics can bring the worst in you. As long as it is not regular pattern of certain individuals being very liberal with their Fs and As, I think it is fine. The examples you gave are cherry picked in reference to a discussion about a blog post that you made and was directed at you. It says nothing about the general level of civility at HN, which I think is pretty decent, not perfect, but decent.

Forcing people to use their real name is the worst idea that I can think of.

Re: Some Tips to Improve the Civility on Hacker News

#17
post #5

HN is not civil towards external targets (i.e. bloggers, Microsoft, Zuckerberg, etc), but it is civil in the sense that HN readers are discouraged from attacking each other. I guess we could learn to not attack the authors or subjects of the articles, but that's not the point. The "civil discussion" rules are there to keep the discussion from degrading into flame wars, not to be nice to bloggers. Also, not that he us…

I think a lot of the criticism of our generation and of job hopping is projection. The whining about entitled, self-centered young people sounds exactly like the complaints that were made of the Boomer generation in 1970, and they're just as exaggerated-- somewhat true, mostly not.

What's lost in this mess is that very few people actually want to job hop. They do it because they have to do it in order to have their career progress at an acceptable pace. It's risky and painful and the vast majority of people would rather not have to do it. So it sucks to be criticized for a behavior that we're forced into.

Loyalty has to be earned. If I'm pigeonholed or passed over for a promotion, damn right I'm going to start looking for another job.

Also, with all the complaints about people job hopping to increase their salaries, this wouldn't work at all if companies paid fair salaries. If companies are slow with raises and promotions, leaving their people underpaid after a couple of years, they get what they deserve when people stream out. (Obviously, this matter is different for cash-strapped startups, but people who join those aren't especially concerned about salary.)

Re: Some Tips to Improve the Civility on Hacker News

#18
post #6

The civility on HN is unparallelled. This community, with pg's guidance has done an amazing job of fostering a thoughtful community for intelligent discussion. Suster's arguments all focus around one particular discussion in which emotions ran a little higher than usual, and are not, in my opinion, representative of the community as a whole. As for Suster's suggestions, the first one would be a mistake. There are man…

I actually rather like that HN doesn't do email notifications or an RSS feed of your own comments/replies.

Well, it is possible to use searchyc to snarf people's streams; I do so for a handful of HN users, e.g.

http://rss.searchyc.com/user/wheels?sort=by_date

Re: Some Tips to Improve the Civility on Hacker News

#19
I'm pretty happy with Hacker News as it is. I think the comments are generally insightful and the few trolls are dealt with swiftly and ruthlessly.

Let's face it, we're not Olde English Lords here in polite discussion. People have opinions and occasionally get animated. Really, who fucking cares if someone curses, if they've got something good to say?

Re: Some Tips to Improve the Civility on Hacker News

#20
post #6

The civility on HN is unparallelled. This community, with pg's guidance has done an amazing job of fostering a thoughtful community for intelligent discussion. Suster's arguments all focus around one particular discussion in which emotions ran a little higher than usual, and are not, in my opinion, representative of the community as a whole. As for Suster's suggestions, the first one would be a mistake. There are man…

I agree. Hacker News has a lot great people on it.

Karma, however, is a joke because accounts are regularly nuked for no good reason, which necessitates starting over at zero. Hellbanning spammers and outright trolls makes sense. Hellbanning good posters who make one annoying comment is ridiculous. If you don't like what someone has to say, disagree with him. (This is also why I don't like downvoting without a reply; I think people who object to something should say why they object to it.)

Post reply on HN