It's worth noting because this was an ad network that tried to do the job the right way. The heyday of the indie blog was already over, this is just a reflection of that. It worked for a while, and the wold has moved on. It's not a matter of "grinding it out" or persistence, the market factors have simply changed. I wonder what Daring Fireball (AFAIK by far the site with largest readership on the Deck) will do. I'm s…
The Deck ad network is shutting down
11–20 of 108 posts
Re: The Deck ad network is shutting down
#12It's worth noting because this was an ad network that tried to do the job the right way. The heyday of the indie blog was already over, this is just a reflection of that. It worked for a while, and the wold has moved on. It's not a matter of "grinding it out" or persistence, the market factors have simply changed. I wonder what Daring Fireball (AFAIK by far the site with largest readership on the Deck) will do. I'm s…
Gruber already appears to do some inventory management himself (see the occasional posts about unbooked RSS sponsorship opportunities), so I assume he'll just have to take on the rest of it. He probably has enough relationships with advertisers for now that he won't have to start hustling yet, but I'd imagine he'll eventually want to work with a contractor to sell spots.
Re: The Deck ad network is shutting down
#13So did Waxy: https://twitter.com/waxpancake/status/847188783724322816
Re: The Deck ad network is shutting down
#14Re: The Deck ad network is shutting down
#15uBlock Origin will block the article by default. It seemed like a straight-forward business with little overhead considering there wasn't anything invasive or highly technical about the advertising units. Is there a market for that type of advertising online?
> uBlock Origin will block the article by default. Seems short-sighted! And, also, an indication of where things are today.
@@||decknetwork.net^$first-party
Re: The Deck ad network is shutting down
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
Publishers massively overvalue their inventory and don't understand how their million views are worth only buttons. Ad networks can't pay more because they don't get paid more from the advertisers. The key is that no one clicks on banners any more, so it really is a race to the bottom.
Did people ever click on banners after like 2002? CTR on these things are abysmal. The whole ad business reeks of desperation. However, it does pay the bills, so I guess it actually works.
For instance someone googling reviews of Samsung Dryers probably is considering buying a dryer of some kind.
The further you get from that initial intent the less valuable your ads are until they are basically worthless.
Re: The Deck ad network is shutting down
#17Like it or not, there are real advantages to walled gardens like facebook. To ad buyers, it's a single platform where one can target the entire world person-by-person -- even across multiple devices (iPad, phone, laptop), with hyper-accurate segmentation and user tracking, strong identity services with all the abuse/spam prevention and payment capability that enables, multi-lingual, optimized CDN-based distribution to ensure all content is fast and cheaply delivered to every corner of the globe (an especially big deal given the rise of video ads), mobile-first UX that works across every conceivable handset including iOS and every esoteric variant of Android, etc.
I'm not pleased about a lot of this, but it's a mistake to deny what's happening.
Re: The Deck ad network is shutting down
#18It's worth noting because this was an ad network that tried to do the job the right way. The heyday of the indie blog was already over, this is just a reflection of that. It worked for a while, and the wold has moved on. It's not a matter of "grinding it out" or persistence, the market factors have simply changed. I wonder what Daring Fireball (AFAIK by far the site with largest readership on the Deck) will do. I'm s…
Re: The Deck ad network is shutting down
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Publishers massively overvalue their inventory and don't understand how their million views are worth only buttons. Ad networks can't pay more because they don't get paid more from the advertisers. The key is that no one clicks on banners any more, so it really is a race to the bottom.
Did people ever click on banners after like 2002? CTR on these things are abysmal. The whole ad business reeks of desperation. However, it does pay the bills, so I guess it actually works.
Re: The Deck ad network is shutting down
#20We don't have nearly as much mobile traffic (only ~6%), so hopefully we will be able to make it work, but this doesn't fill me with confidence.