Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's no free lunch when it comes to genetics. If it was possible to be a lot smarter without negative consequences then we probably would have evolved it already. Most likely there are some downsides such as increased risk of depression, autism, schizophrenia, etc.
Perhaps. Another explanation might be that it doesn't produce enough evolutionary advantages in the context of a human society. One could also argue that the medical advancements of the last 100 years or so have greatly reduced the evolutionary pressure created by "bodily weakness", and I'd imagine similar arguments could be made in the opposite direction when it comes to other factors (like the norms of a society an…
Elon Musk’s Neuralink wants to boost the brain to keep up with AI
171–180 of 290 posts
Re: Elon Musk’s Neuralink wants to boost the brain to keep up with AI
#172Musk is wrong that input bandwidth is a limiting factor in intelligence. We don't efficiently use the megapixel our phones show us, let alone the several megapixels on our laptops. Improving UIs will provide much more bang for the buck for many many decades to come. A neural lace is the equivalent of trying to increase the yield per square inch of the herbs in your window box when you have 100 acres of empty land aro…
Imagine thinking about something and having it appear on your brain interface HUD vs typing a google search on your phone and reading it from the screen. How is that not a bandwidth problem?
Re: Elon Musk’s Neuralink wants to boost the brain to keep up with AI
#173forgive me if i am wrong, i don't know much about these matters. Just a quick thought. For me Elon Musks ventures seem a bit like angel-investors. Every company he founds has probability of making billions (car-company, rockets, tunnelling etc.), though they are also high risk. Of course he can't spread his risk as broad as a investor. But while risky, every venture seems to be very calculated, the opposite of crazy.…
he needs the money, but he doesn't want it. he's not playing the business game for the game's sake, he wants to advance civilization and the best way to do it is via billion dollar disruptive businesses, so that's what he's doing. i applaud him for keeping true to this after however many years of having access to that much assets.
Re: Elon Musk’s Neuralink wants to boost the brain to keep up with AI
#174Earlier quoted context omitted.
No, I want it to create value that will be given back to me via taxation.
Why would it consent to you leeching onto its productivity?
Re: Elon Musk’s Neuralink wants to boost the brain to keep up with AI
#175Earlier quoted context omitted.
he needs the money, but he doesn't want it. he's not playing the business game for the game's sake, he wants to advance civilization and the best way to do it is via billion dollar disruptive businesses, so that's what he's doing. i applaud him for keeping true to this after however many years of having access to that much assets.
Why is everyone so certain his motivations are noble?
Re: Elon Musk’s Neuralink wants to boost the brain to keep up with AI
#176Earlier quoted context omitted.
No. An entrepreneur doesn't have to do the day to day heavy lifting. An entrepreneur hires and works with people who do the heavy lifting.
Why's this guy being downvoted? There are plenty of capable people out there that can run a given Muskventure. He's got enough money to spitball an idea, spend a good bit of time hiring the right people, choosing a CEO, and letting it ride. The only issue his it seems like his ideas won't make much money - how can you sell Neuralink when the technology doesn't exist to make it feasible? But give it 15 years and Neura…
Re: Elon Musk’s Neuralink wants to boost the brain to keep up with AI
#177BAM - http://www.nature.com/nnano/journal/v10/n7/full/nnano.2015.1... AFAIK, it's the most promising technology for actually making the neural lace. TL;DR: If you put electrodes on an angled plastic mesh, you can roll it up, inject it, and it'll safely unroll. Also, brain cells like to grow into it.
This scenario scare the hell out of me. Is injecting/intercepting brain signals directly really the way forward? Do we really want to create monster human species? IMHO, future AI should be used to enhance human cognitives in a noninvasive way. Never in such a dystopian way as in the movie "The Matrix".
Half my mind is already in cyberspace, why not make it half my brain, too?
Edit: Dystopias don't come from technologies, they come from people being shitty.
Re: Elon Musk’s Neuralink wants to boost the brain to keep up with AI
#178Re: Elon Musk’s Neuralink wants to boost the brain to keep up with AI
#179Earlier quoted context omitted.
Pretty much what they said about reusable rockets and electric cars.
They said that about electric cars? They had electric buses before they had petrol ones. In most ways electric is actually simpler. We've just been waiting for the batteries, and Tesla didn't do anything revolutionary there. Tesla saw the batteries were finally there and found a way to hype, market and sell electric cars successfully. That's praiseworthy. The self-driving stuff and over-the-air software updates are a…
Re: Elon Musk’s Neuralink wants to boost the brain to keep up with AI
#180Earlier quoted context omitted.
he needs the money, but he doesn't want it. he's not playing the business game for the game's sake, he wants to advance civilization and the best way to do it is via billion dollar disruptive businesses, so that's what he's doing. i applaud him for keeping true to this after however many years of having access to that much assets.
Why is everyone so certain his motivations are noble?