Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Has attracting a blog audience become harder?

news.ycombinator.com

111–120 of 186 posts

Re: Ask HN: Has attracting a blog audience become harder?

#111
I've blogged for a bit over 5 years now about programming in general - 53 posts at irregular intervals (https://henrikwarne.com/). I get around 250 to 300 views per day on average, with 1.4 views per visitor (all stats from Wordpress' standard stats).

Whenever I write something new, I submit it to Hacker News and Reddit. It's pretty hard to get on the front page of HN, but a few of my posts have made it there. That usually means a few thousand views. On Reddit (Programming) it is easier to get on the front page, and once there the posts stay there longer (around 24 hours). I also tweet the posts, but pretty much all traffic from Twitter comes due to being on Hacker News or Reddit, not from my own tweets.

The traffic isn't evenly distributed. Most posts get almost no traffic, and one gets maybe a third of all traffic (probably because it shows up in searches a lot): "5 Reasons Why Software Developer is a Great Career Choice" https://henrikwarne.com/2014/12/08/5-reasons-why-software-de...

I think there are other valid reason for blogging apart from building a following. It is a great why to organize your thoughts and "discover" what you think about some issues. Also, hopefully some of what you write is helpful to other people. Another reason is when looking for work - in my experience it helps to be able to point to your blog and show what you think and what you are interested in.

One more thing. I still enjoy blogging, but it takes me a lot of time to write a post. I think some people underestimate the work it takes to write a post.

Re: Ask HN: Has attracting a blog audience become harder?

#112
post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No big mystery - I used to own WordPress blog at sandfly.net.nz but when I moved countries I gave up blogging for so long that my domain lapsed. Once I finally decided to start up again using my own platform I needed a catchy name that would be sure to draw traffic. Naturally I couldn't think of anything so ended up with sheep.horse because I think .horse domains are hilariously stupid.

Maybe .horse is brilliant because everyone owning one thinks they're in on some kind of joke. It's kind of like those giant sunglasses. Not a terrible business plan.

It worked on me :)

Re: Ask HN: Has attracting a blog audience become harder?

#113
I have been blogging for over 15 years on a same domain. I was getting about 1000 unique views a month and perhaps 1 cup of coffee in Adsense revenues. But my blog had no focus, just random low quality posts with occasional decent post.

Around 5 years ago, I decided to clean up my blog. I also decided to use a different domain, and used "proper" 300 redirects, or so I thought.

Anyways my traffic dropped significantly, then I messed up even more up moving my blog back to original domain.

Now I am getting around 50-60 unique sessions a month. I don't really share on social media very often, and once again my blog is a sort of journal. I intend to keep it that way for now.

Re: Ask HN: Has attracting a blog audience become harder?

#114
This is merely my opinion: but yes, and no.

It HAS gotten harder to gain the same amount of traffic you've gotten years ago. No doubt. Back when I ran Windows7Center and Windows8Center (now defunct), we were able to serve 50 million pageviews, gain an Alexa traffic ranking around ~2000 while sustaining a decent passive income from (eventually) doing next to nothing aside from staffing/occasional maintenance/UI updates. Yes, there was luck involved, but there was also much less noise in the whole ecosystem. Less blog-spam, less "Top 7 reasons", less social media presence, etc. However, many of the same issues back then are still relevant now, and the formula for attracting any audience is still largely unchanged.

You'll often hear people say "write original/novel content". But what does that really mean? And is everyone capable of creating such content?

Here are a few things that has always worked quite naturally for me (in the format of "top 4 tips" because why not?):

1) Share something that interests you. Similar to work, side projects, and other ventures, if something truly interests you, you will always do a better job communicating it, have the drive to do it well, and to continue working on it

2) Identify and establish a relation to an experience you have. Tell a story. Humans are largely social creatures, and storytelling has been a part of our history for ages. Stories and experiences are more relatable, not mere fact-dropping.

3) Use your own voice (yes, yes, I know, cliche). I've found what works for me is writing as if I'm speaking directly to my audience. If you were at a dinner table chatting with friends, would you constantly be using arcane, seldom used/big words? Probably not. So what makes blogging any different?

4) Be genuine. Similar to the point above, so much of what we see now is sensationalized, exaggerated to the point where it's so hard to find any truth. Personally, I appreciate honesty, and there are so many people with so many stories to tell, that if people actually spoke up and shared fearlessly, we wouldn't need to have all this BS to keep us "entertained". So I try to share things I wish someone else would have shared to me, things that I'd appreciate.

I've taken a break from running online communities, and been on a 2-year hiatus from blogging on my own blog, which I've never monetized in any way. My last post was October 4, 2014, but I have visitors in the low hundreds, everyday. The total pageviews on this blog has exceeded the low hundred thousands. I do not engage in crossposting, and never on social media, except posting twice or so here on HN, no one in my friend circles or colleagues know I blog except those who actively sought out information on me. I still get very kind and heartwarming emails from all sorts of people for content I put out that I didn't think would help anyone in particular. I still get people who reach out to me and ask about some of the experiences I've shared. Pageviews mean nothing to me, but these simple gestures do.

Sidenote: If you're not simply looking to blog and share with others, but are also intent on your pageview count, along with perhaps selling a product...all of the above still applies, but drip campaigns are also still extremely effective. Collect emails of interested parties and DO NOT betray their trust.

TL;DR: Focus on content, not pageviews. Be genuine and write what interests you, people will come, I promise.

Re: Ask HN: Has attracting a blog audience become harder?

#115
I started blogging a few months ago https://dailyhealthpoints.wordpress.com/ Each article requires me to read on average one science paper, and I spend also quite some time on editing.

Now I have 300 subscribers but sadly it doesn't have the same success as a blog I started ten years ago. That blog was focused on tech and startups. It didn't require any research, every post was only 30mn to 1hr of work, and generated a lot of views and comments.

My assessment is that people moved on. Instead of writing sharp comments on blogs, they would write on Facebook or Twitter. They are attracted by shiny Youtube videos. If they want to see nice pictures, they'd spend time on Instagram instead of going through your gallery blog.

Even the fact that I write long comments here on YC, like many other users, take time away from blogs.

I have changed my strategy and now instead of publishing often, I will only publish twice a week. I will increase the quality and also spend much more time in promoting these 2 articles. I can reformat them for Tumblr, Medium, cross post on various other sites. Also I don't plan for a massive audience anymore. Having ~1000 quality subscribers is more than enough!

Re: Ask HN: Has attracting a blog audience become harder?

#116

I've blogged ( https://sheep.horse/ ) for about 10 years now in a minor way and monitor my logs pretty carefully. This is what I have learnt: * Most of my post get single digit views - not daily, in total. Posting on Twitter or Facebook only helps a little. You can't force people to follow your writing. * I publish RSS and Atom feeds but almost nobody uses them. I ended up removing the social media buttons on my site…

>Blogging (and running a website in general) is not popular these days because so much of the oxygen is taken up by social media or sites like Reddit

Do you think blogging on Reddit/Facebook/Medium/Whatever is not true "blogging"? Much of your audience is already there.

HN is a different story.

Re: Ask HN: Has attracting a blog audience become harder?

#117
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But if I see that right, your Blog doesn't have comments (the one linked in your profile). How is that supposed to feel otherwise if those are not enabled?

Perhaps my "talking to a wall" metaphor was stupid. What I meant was that I'd like to see that people actually read whatever I have to say, instead of, well, not reading - in a way that a wall can't hear you - an actual response however isn't needed. It may also be because I don't have one exact subject, but regardless, too early to tell just yet.

Add them. I'm blogging since 9 years now, and I find comments to be incredibly important. If you are doing a private tech blog, the people you want to reach are people that want to follow you personally. With those you really want to talk, and an occasional comment helps a lot against that impression that no one is reading it. Even if it is just once a month.

Though the most helpful thing for a blog such as this is to write it for yourself. But even then, some external feedback helps.

Re: Ask HN: Has attracting a blog audience become harder?

#119
I've been hosting a blog for around 10 years that has some pretty decent success (in spite of my really infrequent posting). Yes, it is getting harder though I'm not really trying.

The game has changed, and as so many others have posted the heyday of blogs is over. Only certain types of people really care about long form stuff anymore. Those people are hard to reach. So you have to define what success is for you.

Is "success" for you:

1. A big audience? This will be a ton of work and is largely outside of your control. You'll have to be different from everyone else out there and get attention. Not impossible but it's a long uphill road.

2. A dedicated, loyal audience? This is something you can control. If you decide you want a smaller, but happy and loyal following, then start creating quality content specific to a niche group. When people find your site and find this treasure trove of articles they'll bookmark you.

3. Lots of money? If your goal is to make large profits you've got the biggest climb yet. Of course it's not impossible to build a blog in 2017 and make a lot of profit from it, but I personally wouldn't waste my time on such an endeavor.

Anecdotal: at one time I made around $1000 a month from my blog, just from ads. Algorithms changed, the world changed, and in 2012 or so I was super steady at 1k per month. By 2015 I cut it off because I was making around $20 per month with the same ad networks, and... MORE traffic. Things change and you have to be ready for that.

Finally here's something I've been telling bloggers for years. Spend the time on your content instead of spamming. The hours you spent posting links on social media, posting to Reddit, HN,lobste.rs etc is all time you could have spent creating more content.

"Build it and they will come" is still valid in blogging. If you keep creating and pumping out quality content it will be hard to ignore it for long. But it's harder than ever.

Re: Ask HN: Has attracting a blog audience become harder?

#120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I also noticed that the average session time is about 2 minutes, sometimes is just too short to read through a blog post. So I assume that people come there just to get a solution to a problem they have, not to read through all the text. Does your website actively ping back to the server to determine how long a visitor remains on a page?

I use the simplest thing like Google Analytics

Google Analytics 'session duration' is not what you expect it to be.
Post reply on HN