Live data from Hacker News

Smokescreen - a Flash player written in Javascript and HTML5

smokescreen.us

21–30 of 68 posts

Re: Smokescreen - a Flash player written in Javascript and HTML5

#21

Posted 3 days ago: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1387981

I'm sorry I haven't noticed. But I do have noticed http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1387630 because it points to the page I was posting, the homepage. Too bad it hasn't became very popular

Re: Smokescreen - a Flash player written in Javascript and HTML5

#24
post #10

What are the footprint differences between the two? I assume FLV is compiled and optimized for running in the flash plugin...

None of the demos they show that I saw playback FLVs, where are you looking at those? Also worth noting that in one of their demos they say that it only supports up to a "sizable subset of Flash 8" for playback currently. From: http://smokescreen.us/demos/intro.html

Whoops. I meant SWF. I'm wondering the footprint difference between the converted HTML5/JS code vs the compiled SWF.

Re: Smokescreen - a Flash player written in Javascript and HTML5

#25

If this means that animated advertisements and other ad agency annoyances will be coming soon to my iPad web browsing experience, put me down as a detractor.

The sad thing: the ads were coming anyway. If you build a popular platform like the iPad, the advertisers will find a way to get ads on it, whether it's with Flash or not.

But by banning Flash, Apple is pushing advertisers to HTML/Javascript, which ruins the experience for those marginal, blissful few who use Flash blockers on other platforms. Really, you couldn't have asked for a better indicator, short of a mandatory tag. :)

Re: Smokescreen - a Flash player written in Javascript and HTML5

#26
post #19
post #17

What I don't understand is all the people praising HTML5 because it uses less CPU than Flash yet Chrome ends up using 15-20% CPU just to render a simple animation unlike Flash.

Some people probably just assume that switching to HTML5 content always uses fewer CPU resources. There are plenty of informed reasons to prefer HTML content over Flash though. One is that putting performance into the hands of multiple companies will introduce competition. Just like with Javascript speeds, you can expect browser-makers to start racing in other areas of HTML5 performance. I wouldn't be surprised to se…

Anyone could equally write their own version of Flash; the standard is freely available.

Re: Smokescreen - a Flash player written in Javascript and HTML5

#27
post #25

If this means that animated advertisements and other ad agency annoyances will be coming soon to my iPad web browsing experience, put me down as a detractor.

The sad thing: the ads were coming anyway. If you build a popular platform like the iPad, the advertisers will find a way to get ads on it, whether it's with Flash or not. But by banning Flash, Apple is pushing advertisers to HTML/Javascript, which ruins the experience for those marginal, blissful few who use Flash blockers on other platforms. Really, you couldn't have asked for a better indicator, short of a mandato…

Hmmm... I wonder if we could build a bayesian filter for ad blocking rather than deal with explicit blacklists?

Re: Smokescreen - a Flash player written in Javascript and HTML5

#29
post #12

Its amazing that Apple has caused innovation by banning flash. I wonder if this is sustainable, maybe an example of innovation?

Perhaps, but this is very much a "broken-window theory" type of innovation. If this undoubtedly smart developer hadn't needed to work on this to get around Apple's policy, who knows what more progressive achievement he could have accomplished?
Post reply on HN