Kaleidoscope - File comparison for Mac released
11–20 of 55 posts
Re: Kaleidoscope - File comparison for Mac released
#12Re: Kaleidoscope - File comparison for Mac released
#13Amazing website design, love the attention to design that quality mac apps get in comparison to windows ones.
Also, that may well be the longest sentence ever penned.
Re: Kaleidoscope - File comparison for Mac released
#14Does anybody remember the original Kalediscope for Macs. It was awesome for a different look other than Mac OS defaults. I suppose it went away with the classic OS.
The web site of that program is kaleidoscope.net...it doesn't seem to have a Mac OS X version.
Unsanity created ShapeShifter, which is similar and worked on Mac OS X for awhile, but since Snow Leopard it seems Apple has changed enough of the system that it can't work anymore.
Re: Kaleidoscope - File comparison for Mac released
#15I really like seeing developers put in this kind of effort. Maybe Apple will choose to package it with a future version of Xcode. :)
Re: Kaleidoscope - File comparison for Mac released
#16Does anybody remember the original Kalediscope for Macs. It was awesome for a different look other than Mac OS defaults. I suppose it went away with the classic OS.
Re: Kaleidoscope - File comparison for Mac released
#17The title doesn't really give you much to go on, but the app is incredibly well done. It diffs all kinds of binary image formats like PNG, JPG or even PSD. Oh, and the product website is amazingly beautiful too.
Personally, I found the super-fast "shake"-like effect when you click what you think is a link to be very distracting. It also breaks "back", you need to hunt for and learn to use the "Top" button in the top right corner of those pages.
The site uses a paginated, single-page model with sections styled with significant design differences for each "page". When clicking a link (they're not actually links [boooo!]), a JS scroll event is triggered. Some relatively straight-forward tweaks could fix this.
The author uses span tags to wrap elements that act like links. A far more appropriate markup would use an anchor tag with a fragment identifier (#fragment-id). The span tags that are currently in use use class names to identify the "location" of the target. This is, again, poor form. A URL is the tool for specifying location, and URLs are linked using the anchor tag.
HTML Excerpt 1:
Text Scope
Compare text and source code.
Change to:
Compare text and source code.
JS Excerpt 1:
$(".scroll_to_text").click(function() {$.scrollTo($("#text").position().top-40, 300)});
Change to:
$("#text").click(function(event) {$.scrollTo($("body").position().top, 300);event.preventDefault();});
I'm a novice HTML/Javascript guy at best, so the code above may not function correctly in production, but I'm certain that the principle is appropriate.
Re: Kaleidoscope - File comparison for Mac released
#18Does anybody remember the original Kalediscope for Macs. It was awesome for a different look other than Mac OS defaults. I suppose it went away with the classic OS.
I vividly remember the Scherzo theme; who could erase that memory? ;)
We emailed Greg and Arlo (authors of the classic Kaleidoscope) to see if they were cool with us repurposing the name and they were, you'll find their names in our app's About window.
Re: Kaleidoscope - File comparison for Mac released
#19They use these images for that effect in CSS:
http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/static/img/ks_color.png , http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/static/img/ks_shading.png , http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/static/img/ks_mask.png
Lack of merge support is a deal-breaker for me. I was so hopeful because that's the #1 most requested feature in their other app, Versions.
Re: Kaleidoscope - File comparison for Mac released
#20If you're using a Webkit browser, notice the app icon over time. They use these images for that effect in CSS: http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/static/img/ks_color.png , http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/static/img/ks_shading.png , http://www.kaleidoscopeapp.com/static/img/ks_mask.png Lack of merge support is a deal-breaker for me. I was so hopeful because that's the #1 most requested feature in their other app, Versions.
We know about merging. One step at a time...